Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsSupreme Court Agrees to Hear Petition on BJP MP Nishikant Dubey's Remarks...

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Petition on BJP MP Nishikant Dubey’s Remarks Against Judiciary

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a petition concerning the controversial remarks made by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, which allegedly target the apex court. The petition was mentioned before the Chief Justice of India by advocate Narender Mishra, who highlighted the seriousness of the matter.

Speaking to the media, Mishra stated, “I want to inform that I mentioned this matter in front of the Supreme Court citing the gravity of the matter. I informed the CJI about the statement of BJP MP Nishikant Dubey where he attacked the Supreme Court. I informed that his statement has gone viral.”

The remarks, widely circulated on social media, have sparked debate about the limits of political speech and the protection of judicial integrity. Advocate Mishra expressed concern over the lack of response from constitutional authorities, noting, “I also said that there has been no action by the central government and the Attorney General.”

In his submission, Mishra also appealed for the Court’s intervention to direct the removal of the viral videos containing Dubey’s statement from various social media platforms, citing potential harm to the dignity of the judiciary and public trust in judicial processes.

Acknowledging the urgency of the issue, the Chief Justice directed that the matter be listed for hearing in the coming week.

The case is expected to raise important constitutional questions about free speech, accountability, and the balance between political commentary and contempt of court.

Read More: No Service Tax Payable On Income From Mall Management Before 01.05.2006: CESTAT

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

DGFT To Launch Central Processing Dept. for Faceless, Jurisdiction-Free Trade Applications By 2 October 2026

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) is establishing a Central Processing Department (CPD)...

Undisclosed Receipts in ST-3 Return Justify Extended Service Tax Demand: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld a service tax...

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Valuation Must Follow Statutory Procedure: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has held that...

Adjudicating Authority Ignored Remand Directions, Reissued ‘Copy-Paste’ Order: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand 

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

DGFT To Launch Central Processing Dept. for Faceless, Jurisdiction-Free Trade Applications By 2 October 2026

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) is establishing a Central Processing Department (CPD)...

Undisclosed Receipts in ST-3 Return Justify Extended Service Tax Demand: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld a service tax...

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Valuation Must Follow Statutory Procedure: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has held that...