The Madras High Court has upheld provident fund liability against Beedi Company that nearly 700–800 beedi rollers engaged through an intermediary were in fact “employees” under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (EPF Act). The bench of Justice K. Surender emphasized that judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution does not…
Membership Required
Already a member? Log in here
