HomeCase CompilationJURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 13, 2026

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 13, 2026

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 13, 2026.

GST

  1. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONS ARE NOT LIABLE FOR GST ON REGULATORY FEES COLLECTED: SUPREME COURT
  2. GST REGISTRATION LIMIT IN INDIA | 2026
  3. TAXPAYER TO APPROACH GSTAT; ORISSA HIGH COURT MANDATES PRE-DEPOSIT FOR FILING GST APPEAL
  4. NO CONCESSIONAL 0.1% GST ON HDPE DRUMS SUPPLIED TO MANUFACTURER INSTEAD OF MERCHANT EXPORTER: KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
  5. E-WAY BILL GENERATION RISES 18.8% YOY TO 132.6 MILLION IN FEBRUARY, SIGNALLING STRONG GOODS MOVEMENT
  6. GST FRAUD ACCUSED ALLOWED TO TRAVEL ABROAD: BOMBAY HC
  7. R. 86A CAN BE INVOKED ONLY WHERE ASSESSEE FRAUDULENTLY AVAILS INELIGIBLE ITC AND NOT AGAINST GOODS RECIPIENT: KARNATAKA HC
  8. S. 74 SCN VALID EVEN IF BASED ON MATERIAL COLLECTED BY ANOTHER OFFICER: KARNATAKA HC

Service Tax

  1. SERVICE TAX APPEAL FILED BEYOND STATUTORY TIME LIMIT REJECTED: CESTAT
  2. CONTRACTOR NOT ENTITLED TO REFUND OF SERVICE TAX PASSED ON TO MES: CESTAT
  3. SUPPLY OF WATER TO VESSELS WITHIN PORT AREA TAXABLE AS ‘PORT SERVICE’ PRIOR TO JULY 2010: CESTAT
  4. CO-OWNERS RENTING PROPERTY INDIVIDUALLY NOT AN “ASSOCIATION OF PERSONS”, ELIGIBLE FOR SEPARATE SERVICE TAX EXEMPTION: CESTAT
  5. FIXED FACILITY CHARGES FOR STORAGE TANKS NOT TAXABLE AS ‘SUPPLY OF TANGIBLE GOODS’: CESTAT
  6. CESTAT QUASHES PENALTY ON CO-NOTICEES AFTER MAIN NOTICEE SETTLES DISPUTE UNDER SVLDRS
  7. BANK OF INDIA NOT LIABLE TO PAY 8% ON EXEMPT SERVICES: CESTAT ORDERS PROPORTIONATE CENVAT CREDIT REVERSAL INSTEAD
  8. NO SERVICE TAX ON BCCI SUBSIDIES TO CRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BENGAL: CESTAT
  9. SERVICE TAX NOT LEVIABLE ON COMPOSITE WORKS CONTRACTS PRIOR TO 1 JUNE 2007: TELANGANA HIGH COURT 

Customs Duty

  1. FINMIN AUTHORISES RUSSIA’S SBERBANK TO IMPORT GOLD TILL MARCH 2026
  2. DGTR INITIATES ANTI-CIRCUMVENTION PROBE ON SACCHARIN IMPORTS ROUTED THROUGH THAILAND 
  3. DGTR INITIATES ANTI-DUMPING PROBE INTO IMPORTS OF PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE FROM TAIWAN
  4. CUSTOMS BROKER LICENCE SUSPENSION  IN HEROIN SMUGGLING CASE LINKED TO MUNDRA PORT UPHELD: CESTAT 

Excise Duty

  1. CROSS-EXAMINATION NOT ABSOLUTE RIGHT | DELHI HIGH COURT UPHOLDS PENALTY IN GUTKHA MANUFACTURING CASE

Income Tax

  1. NO TCS ON COMPOUNDING FEE FOR ILLEGAL MINING: SUPREME COURT
  2. REASSESSMENT NOTICE ISSUED BEYOND ‘SURVIVING TIME’ UNDER INCOME TAX ACT QUASHED: GUJARAT HIGH COURT 

Company

  1. COMPANIES EXEMPTED FROM RECOGNISING DEFERRED TAX ON OECD PILLAR 2 TAXES: MCA
  2. EPFO ORDERS PASSED DURING IBC MORATORIUM DECLARED UNENFORCEABLE AGAINST CORPORATE DEBTOR: NCLT

Others

  1. FINMIN RECONSTITUTES ADVISORY BOARD UNDER PREVENTION OF ILLICIT TRAFFIC IN NDPS LAW FOR 1 YEAR
  2. CBIC OPENS REGISTRATION FOR ELIGIBLE MANUFACTURER IMPORTER SCHEME ON AEO PORTAL
  3. CONVICTION OF EXCISE CONSTABLE IN BRIBERY CASE UPHELD: SUPREME COURT 
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Marble vs Dolomite Dispute: CESTAT Rejects Reclassification Based on Samples of Other Importers

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Customs Dept. Loses Rs. 5,000-Crore Adani Valuation Dispute as CESTAT Says Issue Already Settled

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Promise-to-Marry Allegations Settled in Lok Adalat Cannot Automatically Disqualify Police Recruit: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that a candidate cannot be denied appointment to the...

Can GST Dept. Demand 1% Cash Payment Under Rule 86B Even After Full Tax Has Been Paid Through ITC? CASE LAWS

A significant legal debate has emerged among GST practitioners regarding the scope and enforceability...

More like this

Marble vs Dolomite Dispute: CESTAT Rejects Reclassification Based on Samples of Other Importers

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Customs Dept. Loses Rs. 5,000-Crore Adani Valuation Dispute as CESTAT Says Issue Already Settled

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Promise-to-Marry Allegations Settled in Lok Adalat Cannot Automatically Disqualify Police Recruit: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that a candidate cannot be denied appointment to the...