HomeOther LawsApple Sued for Allegedly Stealing Trade Secrets to Build Apple Pay

Apple Sued for Allegedly Stealing Trade Secrets to Build Apple Pay

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

What Happened?

Apple Inc. has been hit with a major lawsuit by fintech firm Fintiv Inc., accusing the tech giant of stealing trade secrets to develop its widely used digital payment service, Apple Pay. The case, filed in a federal court in Georgia, also includes serious racketeering (RICO) allegations, a rare move in technology disputes.

Why Is Apple Being Sued?

Fintiv, the successor to mobile payments company CorFire, claims that:

  • Between 2011 and 2012, Apple entered confidential talks with CorFire to explore licensing its mobile wallet technology.
  • Under a non-disclosure agreement (NDA), Apple allegedly gained access to proprietary tech and designs.
  • Apple later hired CorFire engineers and used their insights to create Apple Pay without any licensing or credit.

Fintiv argues this was not accidental—it was part of a calculated strategy to misappropriate CorFire’s innovations.

What Laws Is Apple Accused of Violating?

  • Trade Secrets Misappropriation (under U.S. law)
  • Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) – both Federal and Georgia state laws

The lawsuit accuses Apple of forming an “association-in-fact enterprise” with banks and card issuers to profit from stolen technology—a violation of RICO laws often reserved for organized crime cases.

What’s at Stake for Apple?

If Fintiv wins:

  • Apple could pay triple damages under RICO rules.
  • It may face reputational damage over recurring IP theft claims.
  • The case could reshape legal standards for how big tech firms engage with smaller innovators.

Previous Legal History

  • Fintiv previously filed a patent case in Texas, which was dismissed.
  • The new case in Georgia focuses instead on trade secrets and racketeering, and Fintiv is also appealing the Texas decision.

Quick Summary

Q: Why is Apple being sued by Fintiv?
A: Fintiv accuses Apple of stealing trade secrets from its predecessor CorFire during confidential talks, then using that information to build Apple Pay. The lawsuit includes RICO charges, alleging Apple profited from a pattern of misconduct involving multiple financial institutions.

Case Details at a Glance

🔹 Filed ByFintiv Inc. (Texas-based fintech)
🔹 DefendantApple Inc.
🔹 AllegationsTheft of trade secrets, RICO law violations
🔹 CourtU.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia
🔹 StatusComplaint filed; Apple yet to respond
🔹 Previous CasePatent suit in Texas (dismissed, now under appeal)

Why It Matters

This case could redefine how courts interpret NDAs, trade secret protection, and RICO law in tech disputes. If successful, it may encourage more innovators to challenge large tech companies over alleged misuse of confidential collaborations.

Read More: How to Avoid Tax on Savings Account Interest (Legally) in India? 2025

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Land Transactions for School Expansion Doesn’t Undermine Charitable Status: ITAT Directs Grant of S. 12A Registration Renewal

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chandigarh Bench, has set aside the order of...

ITAT Remands ₹58.69 Lakh Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits, Grants Fresh Opportunity Citing Matrimonial Dispute Impact

The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside additions...

ITAT Deletes CPC Adjustments on Fixed Asset Loss and S. 43B Disallowance

The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted adjustments made...

Non-Issuance of S. 143(2) Notice Not Fatal in Belated Return Cases: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Rs. 4.59 Cr Addition on Export Sales 

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chandigarh Bench, has upheld the deletion of an...

More like this

Land Transactions for School Expansion Doesn’t Undermine Charitable Status: ITAT Directs Grant of S. 12A Registration Renewal

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chandigarh Bench, has set aside the order of...

ITAT Remands ₹58.69 Lakh Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits, Grants Fresh Opportunity Citing Matrimonial Dispute Impact

The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside additions...

ITAT Deletes CPC Adjustments on Fixed Asset Loss and S. 43B Disallowance

The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted adjustments made...