Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationRajasthan Anti-Conversion Bill: Life Imprisonment, Rs. 50 Lakh Fine Proposed in New...

Rajasthan Anti-Conversion Bill: Life Imprisonment, Rs. 50 Lakh Fine Proposed in New Draft

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Rajasthan government led by Chief Minister Bhajan Lal Sharma is set to introduce a revised anti-conversion Bill in the upcoming Monsoon Session of the State Assembly, featuring harsher punishments including life imprisonment and fines of up to Rs. 50 lakh for unlawful conversions.

Deputy Chief Minister Prem Chand Bairwa and Cabinet colleagues, including Law and Legal Affairs Minister Jogaram Patel, announced that the proposed legislation—the Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Bill, 2025—will replace the earlier version tabled in February this year, which was withdrawn before debate.

Under the revised draft, individuals found guilty of unlawful religious conversion could face imprisonment ranging from seven to fourteen years and a minimum fine of ₹5 lakh. Conversions involving minors, women, persons with disabilities, or members of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes could attract imprisonment of 10–20 years along with fines starting from ₹10 lakh.

For cases involving mass conversions, the punishment may extend to 20 years of imprisonment and a fine of at least ₹25 lakh. Repeat offences could result in life imprisonment and fines up to ₹50 lakh, along with cancellation of the organisation’s registration, termination of government aid, and possible demolition of illegally acquired properties.

The Bill also specifies that inducements such as fraud, force, misrepresentation, marriage, or trafficking used to convert individuals will invite strict penalties of 20 years imprisonment and a minimum fine of ₹30 lakh. Importantly, returning to one’s ancestral religion will not be considered a conversion under this law.

Patel clarified that marriages entered into solely for the purpose of conversion will be declared void. The offences under the proposed law are categorised as cognisable and non-bailable.

The new draft introduces significantly more stringent penalties compared to the previous version, aiming to create a strong deterrent against forced or unlawful religious conversions in the state.

Read More: Telangana Assembly Clears Bills to Provide 42% Quota for Backward Classes in Local Polls

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage: Directors’ Claim of Cooperation Must Be Examined During Trial

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals facing...

Missing Seized Records Must Be Considered While Testing ITC Claim; Duplicate GST Demands Ordered Corrected: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the tax department’s inability to furnish seized...

Capital Addition Can’t Be Taxed on Assumptions in Reassessment: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹2.73 crore addition made...

GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Without Addressing Taxpayer’s Grounds: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has set aside an appellate order concerning cancellation of GST...

More like this

No Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage: Directors’ Claim of Cooperation Must Be Examined During Trial

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals facing...

Missing Seized Records Must Be Considered While Testing ITC Claim; Duplicate GST Demands Ordered Corrected: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the tax department’s inability to furnish seized...

Capital Addition Can’t Be Taxed on Assumptions in Reassessment: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹2.73 crore addition made...