HomeNotificationPre-deposit On Penalty Only In Appeal Notified w.e.f. 01.10.2025

Pre-deposit On Penalty Only In Appeal Notified w.e.f. 01.10.2025

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance has notified that the Section 128, 129 and 130 of the Finance Act, 2025 (7 of 2025) which pertains to the pre-deposit for filing an appeal, Penalty for non-compliance of Track and Trade Mechanism for certain goods, and Track & Trace Mechanism respectively will be effective from 01/10/2025.

Presently, as per Section Section 129 of the Finance Act, 2025 (7 of 2025) or Section 107 of the CGST Act the taxpayers were required to make a pre-deposit of 25% of the penalty only in cases where the penalty was imposed under Section 129(3) (detention, seizure, and release of goods and conveyances in transit). For penalties under other provisions, no pre-deposit was required.

However, from 01/10/2025, a uniform 10% pre-deposit of the penalty amount will apply in all penalty appeals, regardless of the provision under which the penalty has been levied.

The law was silent on pre-deposit in cases where the dispute pertained only to penalties. But from 01.10.2025) uniform 10% pre-deposit of the penalty amount has now been prescribed for appeals before the Tribunal.

Notification Details

Notification No. 16/2025–Central Tax

Date: 17/09/2025

Read More: Consolidated SCN Covering Multiple Financial Year Permissible In GST Fraud Cases: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Balance Sheet-ST-3 Mismatch Requires Proper Reconciliation: CESTAT Remands ₹6.72 Crore Service Tax Demand

The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)...

General Penalty Unsustainable Where Late Fee Already Levied: Madras High Court Quashes Duplicate GST Late Fee Demand

The Madras High Court has held that the GST Department cannot levy a duplicate...

3 Month Timeline U/s 121 IBC Is Directory, Delay in Bankruptcy Petition Against Personal Guarantor Can Be Condoned: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the three-month period prescribed...

NCLT Can’t Interfere with ED’s PMLA Attachments During CIRP: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, has held that the National...

More like this

Balance Sheet-ST-3 Mismatch Requires Proper Reconciliation: CESTAT Remands ₹6.72 Crore Service Tax Demand

The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)...

General Penalty Unsustainable Where Late Fee Already Levied: Madras High Court Quashes Duplicate GST Late Fee Demand

The Madras High Court has held that the GST Department cannot levy a duplicate...

3 Month Timeline U/s 121 IBC Is Directory, Delay in Bankruptcy Petition Against Personal Guarantor Can Be Condoned: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the three-month period prescribed...