HomeNotificationCBIC Mandates Personal Hearing Through Video Conferencing Under GST Act, Customs Act,...

CBIC Mandates Personal Hearing Through Video Conferencing Under GST Act, Customs Act, Central Excise Act

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes And Customs (CBIC) has issued the instructions mandating personal hearing through video conferencing under GST Act, Customs Act, Central Excise Act and  Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994.

The instruction dated 21.08.2020, was amended by the Instruction dated 28.07.2022. As per the amendment the conduct of personal hearing by adjudicating/appellate authority shall be done in the virtual mode only at the request of the assessee. The virtual mode of hearing shall not be mandatory. For the assesses not opting for the virtual mode, the personal hearing shall be taken in physical mode. 

The instruction in the subject matter, as amended, has been re-examined in the light of representations received subsequently. 

On re-examination of the subject matter, the amendment dated 28.07.2022 has now been withdrawn. With this change, the original instruction dated 21.08.2020 has been reinstated, making it mandatory for all departmental quasi-judicial/appellate authorities to conduct personal hearing for proceedings under the specified Acts through Video Conferencing (VC), i.e., in the Virtual Mode. 

No Personal Hearing Through Video Conferencing In Exceptional Cases

Exceptions to allow personal hearing in Physical mode by the concerned authorities may be resorted to on receipt of specific request from the party concerned, and after recording the reasons for the same in writing.

Instruction Details

F.No. 390/Misc/3/2019-JC

Date: 05/11/2024

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

S. 54 Deduction Can’t Be Restricted Merely Because New House Is Purchased Jointly With Spouse: ITAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

Survey Disclosure Can’t Be Reclassified as Se. 69A Income Through Rectification U/s 154: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that income...

Supreme Court Issues Notice on Centre’s Challenge to Telangana HC Verdict Striking Down ISD ITC Distribution Rule

The Supreme Court has issued notice on a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by...

5G Radio Unit Is Classified Under CTH 8517 6260: CESTAT 

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

S. 54 Deduction Can’t Be Restricted Merely Because New House Is Purchased Jointly With Spouse: ITAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

Survey Disclosure Can’t Be Reclassified as Se. 69A Income Through Rectification U/s 154: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that income...

Supreme Court Issues Notice on Centre’s Challenge to Telangana HC Verdict Striking Down ISD ITC Distribution Rule

The Supreme Court has issued notice on a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by...