HomeNotificationCBIC Mandates Personal Hearing Through Video Conferencing Under GST Act, Customs Act,...

CBIC Mandates Personal Hearing Through Video Conferencing Under GST Act, Customs Act, Central Excise Act

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes And Customs (CBIC) has issued the instructions mandating personal hearing through video conferencing under GST Act, Customs Act, Central Excise Act and  Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994.

The instruction dated 21.08.2020, was amended by the Instruction dated 28.07.2022. As per the amendment the conduct of personal hearing by adjudicating/appellate authority shall be done in the virtual mode only at the request of the assessee. The virtual mode of hearing shall not be mandatory. For the assesses not opting for the virtual mode, the personal hearing shall be taken in physical mode. 

The instruction in the subject matter, as amended, has been re-examined in the light of representations received subsequently. 

On re-examination of the subject matter, the amendment dated 28.07.2022 has now been withdrawn. With this change, the original instruction dated 21.08.2020 has been reinstated, making it mandatory for all departmental quasi-judicial/appellate authorities to conduct personal hearing for proceedings under the specified Acts through Video Conferencing (VC), i.e., in the Virtual Mode. 

No Personal Hearing Through Video Conferencing In Exceptional Cases

Exceptions to allow personal hearing in Physical mode by the concerned authorities may be resorted to on receipt of specific request from the party concerned, and after recording the reasons for the same in writing.

Instruction Details

F.No. 390/Misc/3/2019-JC

Date: 05/11/2024

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Supreme Court Restrains CBI, ED From Filing Report in Rahul Gandhi Assets Case; Allahabad HC Proceedings Deferred

The Supreme Court on August 17, 2026, directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI),...

CBIC Cadre Restructuring 2026

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) is in the midst of...

Aircraft Hiring Taxable as Supply of Tangible Goods: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai has held that the...

1 Year Limitation Imposed by Customs Notification Cannot Defeat Refund Claim: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Regional Bench, has allowed...

More like this

Supreme Court Restrains CBI, ED From Filing Report in Rahul Gandhi Assets Case; Allahabad HC Proceedings Deferred

The Supreme Court on August 17, 2026, directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI),...

CBIC Cadre Restructuring 2026

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) is in the midst of...

Aircraft Hiring Taxable as Supply of Tangible Goods: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai has held that the...