Govt. Appoints Panel of Sr./Jr. Standing Counsels For CBIC To Handle Indirect Tax Litigation In Delhi and Patna High Courts

HomeNotificationGovt. Appoints Panel of Sr./Jr. Standing Counsels For CBIC To Handle Indirect...

Govt. Appoints Panel of Sr./Jr. Standing Counsels For CBIC To Handle Indirect Tax Litigation In Delhi and Patna High Courts

Notification

Published on

28/03/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Govt. Appoints Panel of Sr./Jr. Standing Counsels For CBIC To Handle Indirect Tax Litigation In Delhi and Patna High Courts

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance has appointed a Panel of Sr./Jr. Standing Counsels for Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) to Handle Indirect Tax Litigation in Delhi and Patna High Courts.

The Board has clarified that field formations i.e., CGST Delhi Zone and CGST Ranchi Zone, Patna may avail services of the Sr./Jr. Standing Counsels, appointed vide Board’s Order F. No. 2378A/13/2023-Legal (Part-IV) dated 04.07.2024 (copy available on CBIC website) for handling DRI/DGGI cases of Indirect Taxes before various High Courts and other fora.

Click Here To Read Order

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
CBIC

Govt. Appoints Panel of Sr./Jr. Standing Counsels For CBIC To Handle Indirect Tax Litigation In Delhi and Patna High Courts

Latest articles

Gross Receipts Must Be Correctly Declared in ST-3 Returns: CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand Based on Income Tax Return Mismatch

Balance Sheet-ST-3 Mismatch Requires Proper Reconciliation: CESTAT Remands ₹6.72 Crore Service Tax Demand

General Penalty Unsustainable Where Late Fee Already Levied: Madras High Court Quashes Duplicate GST Late Fee Demand

3 Month Timeline U/s 121 IBC Is Directory, Delay in Bankruptcy Petition Against Personal Guarantor Can Be Condoned: NCLAT

More like this

Gross Receipts Must Be Correctly Declared in ST-3 Returns: CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand Based on Income Tax Return Mismatch

Balance Sheet-ST-3 Mismatch Requires Proper Reconciliation: CESTAT Remands ₹6.72 Crore Service Tax Demand

General Penalty Unsustainable Where Late Fee Already Levied: Madras High Court Quashes Duplicate GST Late Fee Demand

About us

Company

Categories