Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationLok Sabha Passes Manipur GST Amendment and Appropriation Bills Amid Opposition Uproar

Lok Sabha Passes Manipur GST Amendment and Appropriation Bills Amid Opposition Uproar

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Lok Sabha on Saturday passed the Manipur Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2025, which amends the Manipur Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman explained that the Bill replaces an ordinance necessitated by President’s Rule in the state, stressing that its passage is essential for implementing long-approved GST Council amendments. Without it, she warned, Manipur’s revenue collection would be adversely affected.

The House also cleared the Manipur Appropriation (No. 2) Bill, 2025, authorizing withdrawal of funds from the Consolidated Fund of Manipur for the financial year 2025-26. The Centre will provide an additional budgetary allocation of Rs. 2,898 crore, including Rs. 1,667 crore for capital expenditure. Of this, Rs. 523 crore is earmarked for rehabilitation of displaced persons in relief camps, while Rs. 542 crore will go towards strengthening security in the state.

Criticizing the opposition for disrupting proceedings, Sitharaman accused them of “shedding crocodile tears” for Manipur while blocking discussions on its budget. Both Bills were passed without debate amid continuous protests by opposition members.

Read More: Singapore Work Permit Rules 2025: Higher Salary Floors, Age Cap, and Stricter Hiring Proof

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Importer’s Consent To Higher Customs Value Does Not Bar Appeal; Enhancement Needs Supporting Evidence: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that an...

Consent to Higher Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Import Data Alone Can’t Justify Enhancement: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that an...

Settled Tax Exemptions Can’t Be Reopened In Remand Proceedings: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside an...

Rs. 2.16 Lakh Service Tax Demand Set Aside Over Threshold Exemption, Lack Of Proof Of Suppression: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...

More like this

Importer’s Consent To Higher Customs Value Does Not Bar Appeal; Enhancement Needs Supporting Evidence: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that an...

Consent to Higher Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Import Data Alone Can’t Justify Enhancement: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that an...

Settled Tax Exemptions Can’t Be Reopened In Remand Proceedings: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside an...