HomeNotificationIndian Bank Exempted From S. 19(2) of Banking Regulation Act, 1949

Indian Bank Exempted From S. 19(2) of Banking Regulation Act, 1949

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance has notified the grant of an exemption to Indian Bank from the provisions of Section 19(2) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, allowing it to hold shares in excess of the statutory limit in ASREC (India) Limited.

Section 19(2) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ordinarily restricts banking companies from holding shares in any company — whether as pledgee, mortgagee, or absolute owner — beyond 30% of either the paid-up share capital of the investee company or the bank’s own paid-up capital and reserves, whichever is lower. The provision is designed to prevent excessive exposure and potential risk concentration in a single entity, thereby ensuring prudent banking practices.

However, invoking its powers under Section 53(1) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and acting upon the recommendation of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the Central Government has issued a special notification exempting Indian Bank from this restriction specifically with regard to its shareholding in ASREC (India) Limited. This exemption permits Indian Bank to continue holding shares in ASREC that exceed the statutory cap outlined under Section 19(2).

ASREC (India) Limited, a prominent asset reconstruction company, plays a key role in the financial ecosystem by acquiring and resolving stressed assets. Indian Bank’s increased stake is seen as a strategic move, potentially enhancing the bank’s ability to participate more actively in the distressed asset market.

Notification Details

F. No. 7/11/2022-BOA.I]

Date: 14th May, 2025

Read More: Product Support Service By Coal India For Import Of Goods Covered Under Customs Valuation Rules: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Rajasthan HC Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Exemplary Costs on CBIC For Vindictive Suspension of IRS Officer

The Rajasthan High Court has imposed the exemplary cost of Rs. 5 Lakh on...

No Liability Without Proof of Prior Knowledge of Import Misdeclaration: CESTAT Drops Penalties on Customs Broker

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Venture Capital Investment Profits Not Taxable as Fund Management Service, Royalty on Copyright Outside Service Tax Net: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

GST Appeal Delay Condoned After Portal Continued to Show Case as ‘Pending for Order’: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court has held that where a taxpayer is prevented from filing...

More like this

Rajasthan HC Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Exemplary Costs on CBIC For Vindictive Suspension of IRS Officer

The Rajasthan High Court has imposed the exemplary cost of Rs. 5 Lakh on...

No Liability Without Proof of Prior Knowledge of Import Misdeclaration: CESTAT Drops Penalties on Customs Broker

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Venture Capital Investment Profits Not Taxable as Fund Management Service, Royalty on Copyright Outside Service Tax Net: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...