Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationIndia Anti-Dumping Duty Plastic Processing Machinery China Taiwan

India Anti-Dumping Duty Plastic Processing Machinery China Taiwan

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance has officially imposed anti-dumping duties on imports of Plastic Processing Machinery (PPM), particularly injection moulding machines, originating from China and Taiwan.

The decision follows the final findings by the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR), which confirmed that these imports were being dumped at unfairly low prices, causing material injury to Indian manufacturers.

Dumping Confirmed, Injury Established

The DGTR, in its notification dated March 27, 2025, concluded that PPM imports from China and Taiwan were being sold in the Indian market at dumped prices. This led to significant injury to the domestic industry. The dumping margins and injury margins, confirmed in the investigation, formed the basis for imposing varying levels of anti-dumping duties, depending on the exporter and country.

Key Producers and Duty Rates

The anti-dumping duty—levied on the Cost, Insurance, and Freight (CIF) value—ranges from 0% to 63%. Here are the key highlights:

  • Dongguan Fu Chun Shin (China): 48%
  • Chen Hsong Machinery (China): 27%
  • Yizumi Precision (China): 35%
  • Husky Injection Molding Systems (China): 0% (No injury found)
  • Other Chinese producers not specifically listed: 63%
  • Chen Hsong Machinery Taiwan Co.: 39%
  • Huarong Plastic Machinery Co. (Taiwan): 0%
  • Other Taiwanese producers: 53%

Additionally, Chinese-origin goods routed through any third country and vice versa are also covered under the scope of the duty.

Product Scope and Exemptions

The scope of the anti-dumping duty includes all kinds of injection moulding machines with a clamping force between 40 tonnes and 1500 tonnes, whether imported as fully assembled, semi-knocked down (SKD), or completely knocked down (CKD) units.

However, several product types are excluded from the duty, such as:

  • Blow moulding machines,
  • Vertical injection moulding machines,
  • All-electric variants,
  • Specialized footwear machinery,
  • Second-hand machines, and
  • Standalone components not integral to injection moulding units.

Duration and Enforcement

The duty will remain in effect for five years from the date of publication in the Official Gazette (June 26, 2025), unless revoked or modified earlier. It will be collected in Indian currency and calculated using the exchange rate applicable under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962.

Notification Details

Notification No. 21/2025-Customs (ADD)

Date: 26th June, 2025

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...

More like this

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...