HomeNotificationIndia Imposes Anti-Dumping Duty on Soft Ferrite Cores from China

India Imposes Anti-Dumping Duty on Soft Ferrite Cores from China

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Tax and Customs (CBIC) has imposed an anti-dumping duty on imports of soft ferrite cores from China to safeguard domestic manufacturers from unfair trade practices. 

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) issued Notification No. 04/2025-Customs (ADD), enforcing duties ranging from 31% to 35% on specific Chinese exporters.

The decision follows an investigation by the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR), which concluded that Chinese soft ferrite cores were being dumped in India at unfair prices, causing material injury to domestic producers. The DGTR’s final findings, published in December 2024, confirmed that these imports had a detrimental impact on Indian industry.

Duty Structure

The notification specifies anti-dumping duties based on the producer and exporter:

  • Huzhou Haotong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.: 31%
  • Yibin Jinchuan Electronics Co., Ltd. and Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd.: Exempted
  • Other Chinese producers: 35%
  • Imports from any country, but originating in China: 35%

The duty applies to Manganese-Zinc-based Soft Ferrite Cores of various geometries, including EE/E/EF, PQ/EQ, ET, Toroid, UU/UI, I Bars, and ER types.

Five-Year Protection for Indian Industry

The duty will remain in effect for five years unless revoked or amended earlier. It aims to curb unfair trade practices and provide relief to domestic manufacturers struggling with underpriced imports.

The move aligns with India’s broader trade policy of protecting key domestic industries from predatory pricing while promoting fair competition. Industry experts expect the measure to boost local production and reduce dependence on Chinese imports.

Notification Details

Notification No. 04/2025-Customs (ADD)

Date: 18th March, 2025

Read More: Customs Dept’s Jurisdiction Under E-Cigarettes Prohibition Act, 2019: Delhi High Court To Examine

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Classification of ‘Lip Seal’ as Rubber Product, Not Automobile Part; Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked in Interpretation Disputes: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has...

Imported Marble Diversion Into Domestic Market Not Supported By Evidence: CESTAT Quashes 10.80 Crore Customs Duty Demand On EOU

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has set aside...

Karnataka High Court Upholds GST Cross-Empowerment: State Tax Officers Can Act as ‘Proper Officers’ Under IGST Without Separate Notification

The Karnataka High Court has held that officers appointed under the State GST law...

Luxury Pens Worth Rs. 30 Lakh Seized at Ahmedabad Airport

A routine arrival at Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport turned into an unusual high-value...

More like this

Classification of ‘Lip Seal’ as Rubber Product, Not Automobile Part; Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked in Interpretation Disputes: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has...

Imported Marble Diversion Into Domestic Market Not Supported By Evidence: CESTAT Quashes 10.80 Crore Customs Duty Demand On EOU

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has set aside...

Karnataka High Court Upholds GST Cross-Empowerment: State Tax Officers Can Act as ‘Proper Officers’ Under IGST Without Separate Notification

The Karnataka High Court has held that officers appointed under the State GST law...