Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationCBDT Bars Income Tax Deduction on Expenditure Incurred to Settle Proceedings Related...

CBDT Bars Income Tax Deduction on Expenditure Incurred to Settle Proceedings Related to Contraventions Under These Acts

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has barred income tax deduction on expenditure incurred to settle proceedings related to contraventions or defaults under SEBI Act, Competition Acts and Depositories Act.

The notification specifically states that such expenditure will not be considered as incurred “for the purpose of business or profession,” thereby disqualifying it from deduction. The laws mentioned under this notification include:

  • The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Act, 1992
  • The Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956
  • The Depositories Act, 1996
  • The Competition Act, 2002

This directive stems from clause (iv) of Explanation 3 to sub-section (1) of Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, which pertains to disallowance of expenditures incurred in relation to unlawful acts or defaults.

Notification Details

Notification No. 38/2025

Date: 23/04/2025

Read More: India Revises Tariff Values For These Imported Goods Effective April 24, 2025

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Multiple Notices on Same PAN and 26AS Receipts Without Verification: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 2.31 Crore Service Tax Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...

Calls Grow for GST Portal to Introduce Dedicated Anti-Corruption Grievance Mechanism With Protection Against Victimisation

The introduction of a dedicated facility on the Income Tax e-Filing Portal for reporting...

Entire Tooling Advance Can’t Be Added to Assessable Value; Only Proportionate Amortised Cost Is Includible: CESTAT Chennai

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Inspection Forming Only Part of Wider Engineering Assignment Can’t Determine Service Classification: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, has held that an...

More like this

Multiple Notices on Same PAN and 26AS Receipts Without Verification: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 2.31 Crore Service Tax Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...

Calls Grow for GST Portal to Introduce Dedicated Anti-Corruption Grievance Mechanism With Protection Against Victimisation

The introduction of a dedicated facility on the Income Tax e-Filing Portal for reporting...

Entire Tooling Advance Can’t Be Added to Assessable Value; Only Proportionate Amortised Cost Is Includible: CESTAT Chennai

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...