Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationGSTAT Introduces Fresh Rules for Appeals, Expands Virtual and Hybrid Hearings

GSTAT Introduces Fresh Rules for Appeals, Expands Virtual and Hybrid Hearings

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The newly constituted Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has introduced a revised framework for handling appeals, mandating that all pending and fresh cases be screened by a division bench before they can be assigned to a single-member bench.

The move is aimed at ensuring that matters involving significant legal interpretation are not decided by smaller benches, while also promoting consistency in rulings and improving the overall efficiency of dispute resolution under the GST regime.

Under the revised procedure, cases involving tax demands below ₹50 lakh and not raising any substantial question of law may still be heard by a single bench. However, such allocation will require prior approval from the GSTAT President or Vice-President. If, during proceedings, a legal issue is identified in the matter, the case will have to be referred back to a division bench for adjudication.

To streamline hearings and case management, GSTAT has also categorised disputes into three broad segments. The first category includes cases relating to taxability, classification, valuation and input tax credit (ITC). The second category covers matters linked to registration, assessment, refund and recovery proceedings. The third category includes disputes involving penalties, seizures, confiscation and other residual issues. Such residual matters will be heard by the bench dealing with the principal dispute to avoid fragmented proceedings.

In a parallel administrative exercise, the tribunal has finalised bench rosters for states and Union Territories across the country, including major centres such as Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Chennai and Kolkata. The framework also provides for virtual, hybrid and circuit hearings to improve accessibility and reduce delays.

Read More: DRI Seizes 60,000 Kg Smuggled Areca Nuts in Major Northeast Crackdown; 5 Arrested

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Writ Appeal Bench Can’t Reverse a Just and Reasonable Order Merely Because It Takes a Different View: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a High Court’s Division Bench hearing a Letters...

Public Property Auction Can Be Cancelled Before Conveyance If Price Is Substantially Low Despite Full Payment: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the Chandigarh Administration’s decision to cancel the auction of...

Temple Inam Land Can’t Be Gifted To Govt. Even For Public Purpose: Supreme Court Imposes ₹1 Lakh Costs

The Supreme Court has held that temple inam land cannot be gifted to the...

More like this

Writ Appeal Bench Can’t Reverse a Just and Reasonable Order Merely Because It Takes a Different View: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a High Court’s Division Bench hearing a Letters...

Public Property Auction Can Be Cancelled Before Conveyance If Price Is Substantially Low Despite Full Payment: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the Chandigarh Administration’s decision to cancel the auction of...