Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationFinMin Issues Corrigendum To GST Settlement of Funds Rules, 2026 Hindi Version

FinMin Issues Corrigendum To GST Settlement of Funds Rules, 2026 Hindi Version

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance has issued a corrigendum to rectify the Hindi version of the notification relating to the Goods and Services Tax Settlement of Funds Rules, 2026. 

The correction pertains to an earlier notification bearing G.S.R. 225(E) dated March 30, 2026, which had introduced the Goods and Services Tax Settlement of Funds Rules, 2026. According to the corrigendum, an amendment has now been carried out in the Hindi version of the said notification at page number 1 in Rule 1(1). 

The revised substituted rule now states in Hindi: “इन नियमों का संक्षिप्त नाम माल और सेवा कर निधि निपटान नियम, 2026 है।”

The corrigendum effectively corrects the short title clause of the rules in the Hindi text to properly reflect the official name of the “Goods and Services Tax Settlement of Funds Rules, 2026.” 

The Goods and Services Tax Settlement of Funds Rules play an important role in the GST framework as they govern the mechanism for settlement and apportionment of GST funds between the Centre and the States. Such settlement rules are critical for ensuring smooth fiscal transfers under the dual GST structure, especially in relation to IGST distribution and inter-governmental fund adjustments.

Notification Details

Date: 11th May, 2026

Read More: CESTAT Quashes Customs Recovery Proceedings Against Hindustan Copper Over Absence of SCN, 23-Year Delay

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Pre-Regularisation Service Must Count for Pension; Employees Can Choose Old Pension Scheme: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that service rendered by employees on a contractual, ad...

No Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act Without Proof of Pecuniary Advantage: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a public servant cannot be convicted under Section...

Related Eyewitnesses’ Testimony Requires Closer Scrutiny When It Bears ‘Ring of Falsity’: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has acquitted two persons convicted of murder after finding material discrepancies...

ONE CLOCK. DIFFERENT SUNSETS – THE IMPORTANCE OF TIME AND SEQUENCE IN NDPS INVESTIGATIONS

The Article "ONE CLOCK. DIFFERENT SUNSETS - THE IMPORTANCE OF TIME AND SEQUENCE IN...

More like this

Pre-Regularisation Service Must Count for Pension; Employees Can Choose Old Pension Scheme: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that service rendered by employees on a contractual, ad...

No Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act Without Proof of Pecuniary Advantage: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a public servant cannot be convicted under Section...

Related Eyewitnesses’ Testimony Requires Closer Scrutiny When It Bears ‘Ring of Falsity’: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has acquitted two persons convicted of murder after finding material discrepancies...