HomeNotificationFake Circular Alert: Indian Government Has Not Issued Any Advisory on UAE-Based...

Fake Circular Alert: Indian Government Has Not Issued Any Advisory on UAE-Based Companies

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

A fake circular warning Indian exporters about dealing with UAE-based companies has been circulating on social media and messaging platforms. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), Government of India, has officially denied issuing any such advisory.

The fraudulent document claims that the Indian government has cautioned exporters against potential fraudulent activities, payment defaults, and unethical business practices by certain companies operating in the UAE, particularly in the foodstuff and general trading sectors. However, the MEA has clarified that no such warning has been issued.

Government’s Clarification
The Consulate General of India, Dubai, has not issued any such press release or advisory, and the government have no involvement with this document (fake notification) in any capacity.

“No such circular has been issued by the Ministry of External Affairs cautioning exporters against dealing with UAE-based companies. We advise everyone to verify information from official sources before sharing,” the statement read.

The fake advisory falsely claims that several UAE-based companies have been blacklisted due to fraudulent activities, including non-payment for goods and contract breaches. It also alleges that the government has flagged certain entities based on complaints from Indian exporters and international trade partners.

Read More: Relief To Vodafone: Delhi High Court Allows Rs.5.10 Crores Claimed On Account Of Asset Reconstruction Cost

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 4, 2026.GSTEXECUTIVE CIRCULAR CAN’T CURTAIL STATUTORY...

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

The Bengaluru Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has upheld...

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition...

Dept. Failed to Prove Clandestine Removal In ‘Gold Mohar’ Pan Masala Case: CESTAT Quashes Cash and Goods Confiscation 

The Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 4, 2026.GSTEXECUTIVE CIRCULAR CAN’T CURTAIL STATUTORY...

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

The Bengaluru Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has upheld...

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition...