HomeNotificationFinMin Notifies 0.1% Concessional Fee for Guarantees under NaBFID Rules Amendment

FinMin Notifies 0.1% Concessional Fee for Guarantees under NaBFID Rules Amendment

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance has notified amendments to the National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development (NaBFID) General Rules, 2022, providing for a concessional rate of fees on government guarantees for specific foreign borrowings. 

The National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development General (Amendment) Rules, 2025, were published in the Official Gazette on Wednesday.

As per the notification, a new Rule 10 has been inserted which fixes a 0.1% concessional rate of government guarantee fees for borrowings raised by NaBFID from multilateral institutions, sovereign wealth funds, and other foreign institutions specified by the Central Government.

The rules further empower the government to reduce the concessional rate even below 0.1% for borrowings made for purposes mandated by the government. NaBFID will be required to submit a detailed request specifying the nature of borrowings, parties involved, and the intended use of funds to avail such a reduction.

The government guarantee fees will be payable at the time of obtaining the guarantee and subsequently every year on April 1. The notification also clarifies that these fees will be subject to other conditions imposed by the Central Government.

This amendment aims to make foreign borrowing by NaBFID more cost-effective and aligns with the institution’s mandate of financing large-scale infrastructure projects in India.

The original NaBFID General Rules, 2022, were published on January 28, 2022, and were previously amended on July 15, 2022.

Notification Details

Notification No. F. No. 15/10/2021

Date:  30th July, 2025

Read More: GST Registration Cancelled Retrospectively, No IGST Refund Until Restored: Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 25K Cost On Exporter

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

The Delhi High Court has set aside an order of the Institute of Chartered...

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, has set aside a...

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has upheld the...

Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 96 Crore Reassessment Citing ‘Change of Opinion’, Limitation Bar

The Delhi High Court has set aside reassessment proceedings and a Rs. 96.04 crore...

More like this

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

The Delhi High Court has set aside an order of the Institute of Chartered...

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, has set aside a...

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has upheld the...