No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

HomeIndirect TaxesNo Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes...

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Indirect Taxes

Published on

01/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, has set aside a duty demand of ₹51.8 lakh imposed on Container Corporation of India Limited, holding that there was no evidence to establish pilferage of imported goods while under its custody. The bench of Dr. Rachna Gupta and P. V. Subba Rao ruled in…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Evidence of Pilferage

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Membership Required

Latest articles

Unauthenticated Foreign Customs Documents Can’t Establish Pakistani Origin of Imported Dry Dates: CESTAT

Wrong Service Classification Alone Can’t Justify Extended Limitation Without Proof of Tax Evasion: Rajasthan High Court

No Right To Representation Against Anti-Dumping Findings: Delhi High Court

Coal Purchasers Can’t Be Saddled with Clean Energy Cess or Penalty Without Proof of Knowledge: Gauhati High Court

More like this

Unauthenticated Foreign Customs Documents Can’t Establish Pakistani Origin of Imported Dry Dates: CESTAT

Wrong Service Classification Alone Can’t Justify Extended Limitation Without Proof of Tax Evasion: Rajasthan High Court

No Right To Representation Against Anti-Dumping Findings: Delhi High Court

About us

Company

Categories