Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesNo Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes...

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, has set aside a duty demand of ₹51.8 lakh imposed on Container Corporation of India Limited, holding that there was no evidence to establish pilferage of imported goods while under its custody. The bench of Dr. Rachna Gupta and P. V. Subba Rao ruled in…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Organic Manure Made from Sugar Industry By-Products Outside CENVAT Rule 6: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 1.96 Crore Demand

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 42.78 Lakh Service Tax Demand on Reimbursement of Shared Expenses

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata has set aside a...
Indirect Taxes

Transfer of Imported Windmill Parts Before Erection Doesn’t Breach Customs Exemption Conditions: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, has held that transfer...
Indirect Taxes

Integrated Dual Fuel Burner System Eligible for Excise Exemption; Demand Barred by Limitation: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench, has held that...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Organic Manure Made from Sugar Industry By-Products Outside CENVAT Rule 6: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 1.96 Crore Demand

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 42.78 Lakh Service Tax Demand on Reimbursement of Shared Expenses

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata has set aside a...
Indirect Taxes

Transfer of Imported Windmill Parts Before Erection Doesn’t Breach Customs Exemption Conditions: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, has held that transfer...