HomeNotificationSystemic Improvement In Mapping/De-Mapping Of Officers On GSTN Portal: CBIC

Systemic Improvement In Mapping/De-Mapping Of Officers On GSTN Portal: CBIC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has issued instructions in respect of systemic improvement in mapping/de-mapping of officers on the Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) portal.

A reference has been received from the DGoV, CBIC, New Delhi stating therein that a GST officer, mapped in the GSTN portal, was not de-mapped with immediate effect after his relieving from the charge, which resulted in fraudulent sanction of refund by the officer.

De-Mapping Of Officers – Suggestions By DGoV

Certain systemic improvement has been suggested by Directorate General of Vigilance (DGoV) (Hqrs), recommending that officers should be immediately de-mapped from the concerned field formation, on the GSTN portal, upon execution of the GFR-33. 

de-mapping of officers

DGoV further suggested that the same may be monitored by supervisory officers, preferably of the rank of Joint Commissioner / Additional Commissioner, and a compliance report in this regard may be sent to the jurisdictional Commissioner / Principal Commissioner or equivalent within a specified time period. 

It is also requested that clear responsibility and accountability of the concerned jurisdictional officers, responsible for mapping / un-mapping of the officers on the GSTN portal, may be ensured regarding the same.

The Board requested that all Principal Commissioners/ Commissioners or equivalent, may be directed to ensure strict compliance of the directions given by the Directorate General of Vigilance (DGoV).

Instruction Details

Instruction No. 04/2024-GST

Date: 04/10/2024

Read Instruction

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

AO Can’t Reject DCF Share Valuation and Substitute NAV Method for Section 56(2)(viib) Addition: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

Marriage Gifts and Household Cash Retention Can’t Be Rejected on Mere Suspicion: ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that cash...

ITAT Restores Dawoodi Bohra Jamat’s 12AB Registration Matter

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an...

Donation to Political Party Was Part of Accommodation Entry Scheme: ITAT Upholds Denial of S. 80GGC Deduction

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the disallowance...

More like this

AO Can’t Reject DCF Share Valuation and Substitute NAV Method for Section 56(2)(viib) Addition: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

Marriage Gifts and Household Cash Retention Can’t Be Rejected on Mere Suspicion: ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that cash...

ITAT Restores Dawoodi Bohra Jamat’s 12AB Registration Matter

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an...