HomeNotification100+ Customs Appeal Cases Notified by CBIC 

100+ Customs Appeal Cases Notified by CBIC 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has issued a comprehensive notification listing over 100 customs appeals filed across various jurisdictions under the Customs Act, 1962.

The notification enumerates appeal numbers ranging from 1195/2022 to 355/2023, involving private entities and public authorities. These include prominent names such as Tata Motors Ltd., Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., Amazon Wholesale India Pvt. Ltd., Maruti Suzuki, and L&T Ltd.

The appeals have been filed primarily to the Commissioner (Appeals) of Customs across regions like JNCH (Jawaharlal Nehru Customs House), Mumbai, and Kolkata, covering orders issued between 2020 and 2023.

Under Sections 3, 4(1), and 5(1 & 1A) of the Customs Act, 1962, the CBIC has designated specific adjudicating authorities to handle these appeals. The detailed tables provides Appeal Number, Date of Filing, Name of Appellant, Original Order Number and Date Assigned Adjudicating Authority.

Notification Details

Notification No. 39/2025-Customs (N.T.)

Date: 30/05/2025

Read More: Arrest Of ED Assistant Director Involved in Bribery Case Stayed: Kerala High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Importer Can’t Be Penalised When Exporter’s DFIA Licence Remained Valid, Fraud Allegations Failed: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

GST Search Without Sharing DIN Violates Transparency Safeguards, But Doesn’t Invalidate Search: Madras High Court

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has held that while the Document...

EDCT Machine Rentals Attract VAT as ‘Transfer of Right to Use Goods’: Karnataka High Court 

The Karnataka High Court has held that rental charges collected by banks from merchant...

SHIS Benefit Can’t Be Denied by Treating Capital Goods as Mere Parts; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 1.30 Crore Customs Demand

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Importer Can’t Be Penalised When Exporter’s DFIA Licence Remained Valid, Fraud Allegations Failed: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

GST Search Without Sharing DIN Violates Transparency Safeguards, But Doesn’t Invalidate Search: Madras High Court

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has held that while the Document...

EDCT Machine Rentals Attract VAT as ‘Transfer of Right to Use Goods’: Karnataka High Court 

The Karnataka High Court has held that rental charges collected by banks from merchant...