HomeNotificationCJI Sanjiv Khanna Declines Post-Retirement Government Roles, Emphasizes Continued Legal Engagement

CJI Sanjiv Khanna Declines Post-Retirement Government Roles, Emphasizes Continued Legal Engagement

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

On his final day as the 51st Chief Justice of India, Justice Sanjiv Khanna announced he would not accept any official government positions post-retirement. Instead, he expressed a desire to remain active within the legal sphere.

“I will not accept any post-retirement post… perhaps will do something with law,” Justice Khanna stated during an informal interaction with journalists at the Supreme Court premises. He referred to this phase as his “third innings,” indicating plans to continue contributing to the legal field in a non-official capacity.

Justice Khanna’s decision aligns with a growing trend among senior judiciary members to refrain from accepting post-retirement governmental roles. Notably, CJI-designate Justice B R Gavai has also declined any such assignments.

During his tenure, Justice Khanna addressed several significant issues, including the controversy involving Delhi High Court judge Justice Yashwant Verma. He emphasized the necessity for decisive and rational judicial thinking, stating, “We see plus and minus points and decide the issue, then rationally we weigh various factors that help us to make a right decision.”

Justice Khanna’s tenure as Chief Justice, which began on November 11, 2024, was marked by his commitment to judicial integrity and reform. His decision to abstain from post-retirement government roles underscores a dedication to maintaining the independence of the judiciary and continuing to contribute to the legal field without official affiliations.

Read More: YouTuber Savukku Shankar Moves Madras HC Seeking CBI Probe Into Alleged Misappropriation of Funds Meant for Dalit Sanitation Workers

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

ITC Refund Limitation Must Be Counted Based on Nature of Supply, Not Mechanical Application of S. 54: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has clarified the correct interpretation of limitation under Section 54...

CUSTOMS ACT | Nominal Shortfall in Penalty Can’t Deny Amnesty Benefit Under Customs Law: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, has held that a...

Insurance, Hedging & Employee Training Services Qualify as Input Services: CESTAT Allows Cenvat Credit

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Statements Without S. 9D Procedure Not Admissible: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 4.12 Cr CENVAT Credit Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi Principal Bench, has...

More like this

ITC Refund Limitation Must Be Counted Based on Nature of Supply, Not Mechanical Application of S. 54: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has clarified the correct interpretation of limitation under Section 54...

CUSTOMS ACT | Nominal Shortfall in Penalty Can’t Deny Amnesty Benefit Under Customs Law: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, has held that a...

Insurance, Hedging & Employee Training Services Qualify as Input Services: CESTAT Allows Cenvat Credit

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...