HomeOther LawsYouTuber Savukku Shankar Moves Madras HC Seeking CBI Probe Into Alleged Misappropriation...

YouTuber Savukku Shankar Moves Madras HC Seeking CBI Probe Into Alleged Misappropriation of Funds Meant for Dalit Sanitation Workers

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

YouTuber and social activist Savukku Shankar has filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Madras High Court demanding a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into what he alleges is large-scale misappropriation of funds earmarked for welfare schemes targeted at Dalit sanitation workers and entrepreneurs in Tamil Nadu.

At the heart of the PIL is the Annal Ambedkar Business Champions Scheme (AABCS), a flagship initiative intended to economically uplift sanitation workers by supporting them in launching businesses. Shankar alleges that the implementation of the scheme was “illegally and arbitrarily” outsourced to the Dalit Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (DICCI), leading to diversion of funds away from the intended beneficiaries.

According to Shankar’s petition, the DICCI, which was entrusted with overseeing the disbursement of funds and project execution, has deep-rooted political links—particularly with Tamil Nadu Congress Committee (TNCC) President and MLA K. Selvaperunthagai. The petition claims that individuals with political connections to the Congress party disproportionately benefitted from the scheme, while genuine sanitation worker beneficiaries were sidelined.

“This is not just corruption. It is a betrayal of the trust reposed by the most marginalised in our society. Poor Dalits, especially sanitation workers who are meant to be the core beneficiaries of AABCS, have been defrauded,” the PIL alleges.

Shankar also claims that his attempts to expose the irregularities through his YouTube platform, Savukku Media Network, were met with intimidation. He alleges that his residence was vandalised and his mother was threatened by unidentified persons shortly after he began broadcasting details of the alleged scam.

The PIL urges the High Court to direct the CBI to undertake a time-bound, independent investigation into the alleged misappropriation and political interference in the implementation of AABCS and similar welfare schemes. It also calls for protection for whistleblowers and independent journalists investigating corruption in public welfare programs.

Read More: Groww Invest Tech Allegedly Lack Of Adequate Infrastructure To Handle Technical Glitches; Settles SEBI Proceedings with Rs. 34.12 Lakh

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No Penalty for Monthly Liquor Quota Shortfall if Annual Minimum Guaranteed Quantity Is Fully Achieved: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a country liquor licensee who has fulfilled the...

Mere Interpretation of ‘Input Service’ Can’t Trigger Extended Limitation Under CENVAT Law: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

End-Use in Motor Vehicles Can’t Override Specific Customs Tariff Classification for Differential Gears: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

GST on Corporate Guarantees for Pre-2023 Period Faces Judicial Scrutiny: Madras High Court Stays Demand Orders

The Madras High Court has granted interim relief to taxpayers by staying GST demand...

More like this

No Penalty for Monthly Liquor Quota Shortfall if Annual Minimum Guaranteed Quantity Is Fully Achieved: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a country liquor licensee who has fulfilled the...

Mere Interpretation of ‘Input Service’ Can’t Trigger Extended Limitation Under CENVAT Law: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

End-Use in Motor Vehicles Can’t Override Specific Customs Tariff Classification for Differential Gears: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...