Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationCBDT Notifies Approval of Tea Research Association for Scientific Research

CBDT Notifies Approval of Tea Research Association for Scientific Research

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has granted the approval to the Tea Research Association, Kolkata, as a recognized research association for the purposes of scientific research under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

The notification, issued under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Act read with Rules 5C and 5D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, allows the Tea Research Association to qualify for tax benefits associated with scientific research contributions. This approval is expected to incentivize donations to the institution, as contributors may claim deductions under the relevant provisions of the Act.

According to the notification, the approval will remain valid for Assessment Years 2027–28 to 2031–32, subject to compliance with specified conditions.

The CBDT has laid down several conditions to ensure transparency and accountability.

Firstly, the Tea Research Association must comply with Rule 5D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.

Secondly, it is required to furnish an annual statement of donations received in Form 10BD, in accordance with Section 35(1A), by May 31 following the financial year in which donations are received.

Thirdly, the association may also submit correction statements to rectify or update previously filed information.

Fourthly, certificate of donation must be issued to donors in Form 10BE, detailing the amount received and other prescribed particulars within the stipulated timeframe.

Notification Details

Notification No. 24/2026

Date: 20/03/2026

Read More: Defaulting Borrowers Can’t Abuse IBC Provisions To Stall Recovery Proceedings Under SARFAESI Act: Bombay High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

DGFT To Launch Central Processing Dept. for Faceless, Jurisdiction-Free Trade Applications By 2 October 2026

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) is establishing a Central Processing Department (CPD)...

Undisclosed Receipts in ST-3 Return Justify Extended Service Tax Demand: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld a service tax...

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Valuation Must Follow Statutory Procedure: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has held that...

Adjudicating Authority Ignored Remand Directions, Reissued ‘Copy-Paste’ Order: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand 

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

DGFT To Launch Central Processing Dept. for Faceless, Jurisdiction-Free Trade Applications By 2 October 2026

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) is establishing a Central Processing Department (CPD)...

Undisclosed Receipts in ST-3 Return Justify Extended Service Tax Demand: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld a service tax...

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Valuation Must Follow Statutory Procedure: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has held that...