HomeOther LawsDefaulting Borrowers Can’t Abuse IBC Provisions To Stall Recovery Proceedings Under SARFAESI...

Defaulting Borrowers Can’t Abuse IBC Provisions To Stall Recovery Proceedings Under SARFAESI Act: Bombay High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has held that defaulting borrowers cannot abuse provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to stall recovery proceedings under the SARFAESI Act.  The Division Bench of Justice Manish Pitale and Justice Shreeram V. Shirsat observed that a disturbing trend has emerged where chronic defaulters invoke Sections 94 and 95 of…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court Dismisses GST Dept.’s Challenge Over Rs. 70.09 Lakh Refund Due to 394-Day Delay; Keeps Rule 90(2) Interpretation Open

The Supreme Court has dismissed the Special Leave Petitions filed by the Commissioner of...

GST Appeal Limitation Can’t Begin Merely From Portal Upload: Rajasthan High Court Condones 450-Day Delay

The Rajasthan High Court has held that where a GST adjudication order is merely...

Pending Regularisation Proceedings Must Be Respected: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Direction

The Supreme Court has set aside a Madras High Court order directing the Chennai...

Pre-2017 Open University Qualifications Can’t Be Used to Deny Promotion: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has ruled that an employee who obtained educational qualifications under government-recognised...

More like this

Supreme Court Dismisses GST Dept.’s Challenge Over Rs. 70.09 Lakh Refund Due to 394-Day Delay; Keeps Rule 90(2) Interpretation Open

The Supreme Court has dismissed the Special Leave Petitions filed by the Commissioner of...

GST Appeal Limitation Can’t Begin Merely From Portal Upload: Rajasthan High Court Condones 450-Day Delay

The Rajasthan High Court has held that where a GST adjudication order is merely...

Pending Regularisation Proceedings Must Be Respected: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Direction

The Supreme Court has set aside a Madras High Court order directing the Chennai...