Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationFinMin Imposes Provisional Anti-Dumping Duty on Low Ash Metallurgical Coke Imports from...

FinMin Imposes Provisional Anti-Dumping Duty on Low Ash Metallurgical Coke Imports from 6 Countries

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance has imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of Low Ash Metallurgical Coke originating in or exported from Australia, China PR, Colombia, Indonesia, Japan and Russia. 

The decision follows a preliminary investigation conducted by the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR)under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. In its preliminary findings dated November 14, 2025, the DGTR concluded that imports of Low Ash Metallurgical Coke from the subject countries were being dumped into the Indian market at prices below their normal value.

The investigation further established that such dumped imports had caused material injury to the domestic industry, adversely affecting production, capacity utilisation, profitability and market share. On this basis, the DGTR recommended the imposition of provisional anti-dumping duty to prevent further injury pending the final determination.

The subject goods are Low Ash Metallurgical Coke, classifiable under tariff items 2704 00 10, 2704 00 20, 2704 00 30 and 2704 00 90 of the Customs Tariff Act. The product is defined as metallurgical coke with ash content below 18%, excluding ultra-low phosphorous metallurgical coke, and is primarily used in ferro-alloy manufacturing.

The notification prescribes country-specific provisional duties, ranging from USD 60.87 per metric tonne to USD 130.66 per metric tonne, depending on the country of origin and export. Key rates include:

  • China PR: USD 130.66 per MT
  • Colombia: USD 119.51 per MT
  • Russia: USD 85.12 per MT
  • Indonesia: USD 82.75 per MT
  • Australia: USD 73.55 per MT
  • Japan: USD 60.87 per MT

The duty applies irrespective of the producer, covering imports routed through third countries as well.

The provisional anti-dumping duty will remain in force for a period of six months from the date of publication of the notification, unless revoked, amended or superseded earlier. The duty shall be payable in Indian currency, with the applicable exchange rate determined in accordance with Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, as on the date of filing the bill of entry.

Notification Details

Notification No. 41/2025-Customs (ADD)

Date: 31/12/2025

Read More: Centre Reintroduces Capacity-Based Excise Duty on Gutkha and Chewing Tobacco from February 1, 2026

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...

Refund of Interest Paid on GST Liability Discharged Through ITC: GSTAT Restrains State Benches From Deciding Appeals

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has restrained...

More like this

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...