Valuation Of Imported Goods Falls Outside The Purview Of High Court's Jurisdiction: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court dismissed an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata against Supreme Petrochem Ltd., ruling that the issue raised — concerning the valuation of imported goods — falls outside the purview of the High Court’s jurisdiction under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962.

The bench of Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam and Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) held that any question directly linked to the rate of duty or valuation of goods is specifically barred from being heard under Section 130(1) of the Act. As such, the appeal was deemed not maintainable.

The Department had challenged an order passed by the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench, dated November 21, 2024. It argued that the importer had allegedly evaded customs duty by under-declaring freight charges while importing goods classified under Customs Tariff Item No. 29025000. According to the Department, this omission resulted in an incorrect determination of the assessable value under Section 14 of the Act, read with Rule 10(2) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007.

“The issue raised in this appeal by the revenue concerns the valuation of the goods in question. Therefore, there is a clear embargo in entertaining this appeal by this Court,” the Bench stated while dismissing the matter.

The Court left the substantial questions of law proposed by the Department open, clarifying that it may explore other remedies available under the law.

The Court also directed the return of the original certified copy of the Tribunal’s impugned order to the Department’s advocate after retaining a photocopy.

Case Details

Case Title: The Commissioner Of Customs (Port), Kolkata Vs. M/S. Supreme Petrochem Ltd.

Case No.: CUSTA/19/2025 IA No. GA/1/2025

Date:  2nd July, 2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Uday Sankar Bhattacharya

Counsel For Respondent: Jitendra Motwani

Read More: GST Council Meet May Push for Higher Sin Taxes on Tobacco, Sugary Foods and UPFs

Mariya Paliwala
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Telangana High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice Demanding Tax Already Settled Under Amnesty Scheme

The Telangana High Court has quashed the show-cause notice demanding tax already…

Mandatory For Customs Dept. To Issue SCN After Detention Of Goods: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that it is mandatory for the…

Placing Of Matter In Call Book By Customs Dept. Would Not Justify Non-Adjudication Of Notice For 15 Years: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that placing of matter in the…

Timeframe In Which Karnataka High Court Granted Interim Bail In Rs. 665 Cr GST Fraud Case Raises Serious Questions: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Tuesday quashed the interim bail granted by the…