Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesValuation Of Imported Goods Falls Outside The Purview Of High Court's Jurisdiction:...

Valuation Of Imported Goods Falls Outside The Purview Of High Court’s Jurisdiction: Calcutta High Court 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court dismissed an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata against Supreme Petrochem Ltd., ruling that the issue raised — concerning the valuation of imported goods — falls outside the purview of the High Court’s jurisdiction under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962.

The bench of Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam and Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) held that any question directly linked to the rate of duty or valuation of goods is specifically barred from being heard under Section 130(1) of the Act. As such, the appeal was deemed not maintainable.

The Department had challenged an order passed by the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench, dated November 21, 2024. It argued that the importer had allegedly evaded customs duty by under-declaring freight charges while importing goods classified under Customs Tariff Item No. 29025000. According to the Department, this omission resulted in an incorrect determination of the assessable value under Section 14 of the Act, read with Rule 10(2) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007.

“The issue raised in this appeal by the revenue concerns the valuation of the goods in question. Therefore, there is a clear embargo in entertaining this appeal by this Court,” the Bench stated while dismissing the matter.

The Court left the substantial questions of law proposed by the Department open, clarifying that it may explore other remedies available under the law.

The Court also directed the return of the original certified copy of the Tribunal’s impugned order to the Department’s advocate after retaining a photocopy.

Case Details

Case Title: The Commissioner Of Customs (Port), Kolkata Vs. M/S. Supreme Petrochem Ltd.

Case No.: CUSTA/19/2025 IA No. GA/1/2025

Date:  2nd July, 2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Uday Sankar Bhattacharya

Counsel For Respondent: Jitendra Motwani

Read More: GST Council Meet May Push for Higher Sin Taxes on Tobacco, Sugary Foods and UPFs

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 7 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 7, 2026.GST57TH GST COUNCIL MEETING POSTPONED...

Appeal Filing Enabled For Cases Involving NIL or Zero Demand Amount: GSTN 

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has enabled the filing of appeal for...

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Rs. 363 Crore GST Demand Against Vodafone

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a Bombay High Court judgment quashing...

Why do GST Dept. Recover ITC From Buyers When Suppliers Fail to Deposit Tax?

A purchaser may hold a valid tax invoice, receive the goods or services, pay...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 7 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 7, 2026.GST57TH GST COUNCIL MEETING POSTPONED...

Appeal Filing Enabled For Cases Involving NIL or Zero Demand Amount: GSTN 

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has enabled the filing of appeal for...

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Rs. 363 Crore GST Demand Against Vodafone

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a Bombay High Court judgment quashing...