Mere Issuance Of Order Doesn’t Amount To Valid Communication Unless Supported By Evidence of Service: CESTAT

HomeIndirect TaxesMere Issuance Of Order Doesn’t Amount To Valid Communication Unless Supported By...

Mere Issuance Of Order Doesn’t Amount To Valid Communication Unless Supported By Evidence of Service: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

30/03/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Mere Issuance Of Order Doesn’t Amount To Valid Communication Unless Supported By Evidence: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has remanded a dispute involving service tax refund claims, emphasizing that mere issuance of an order does not amount to valid communication unless supported by evidence. The bench of Dr. D.M. Misra (Judicial Member) has observed that the Department failed to produce…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Mere Issuance Of Order Doesn’t Amount To Valid Communication Unless Supported By Evidence of Service: CESTAT

Membership Required

Latest articles

SARFAESI Pre-Deposit Not Mandatory for Appeals Against Purely Procedural DRT Orders: Bombay High Court

Municipal Body Can’t Seal Property for Non-Payment of Property Tax: Bombay High Court Orders Unsealing of 75-Year-Old Vada Pav Vendor’s Shop

Leave Encashment Earned During Central Government Service Eligible for Full Tax Exemption: CIT(A) [READ ORDER]

Cabinet Approves Repatriation of IRS Officer Manoj Kumar to Parent Cadre on Personal Grounds

More like this

SARFAESI Pre-Deposit Not Mandatory for Appeals Against Purely Procedural DRT Orders: Bombay High Court

Municipal Body Can’t Seal Property for Non-Payment of Property Tax: Bombay High Court Orders Unsealing of 75-Year-Old Vada Pav Vendor’s Shop

Leave Encashment Earned During Central Government Service Eligible for Full Tax Exemption: CIT(A) [READ ORDER]

About us

Company

Categories