Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCESTAT Allows Refund Of Unutilised Cenvat Credit On Closure Of Units

CESTAT Allows Refund Of Unutilised Cenvat Credit On Closure Of Units

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has allowed the refund of unutilised cenvat credit on closure of units.

The bench of Binu Tamta (Judicial Member) has observed that while the said request for transferring the credit amount was pending with the Department, the Central Excise Act, 1994 was repealed w.e.f. July, 2017 and as a result, the amount of cenvat credit accumulated could not be transferred to GST. The appellant had no other alternative but to seek the refund of the cenvat credit and the refund application was filed.

Background

The appellant/assessee has challenged the order by which the Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the refund application holding that the refund of unutilised cenvat credit on closure of units is not admissible in the absence of express statutory mandate or provisions of law.

The appellant was engaged in the manufacture of Cutting Oil at their registered address at Delhi under a valid Central Excise Registration. 

Unutilised Cenvat Credit

The appellant had closed its unit at Delhi in the month of March, 2016 and had intimated the Department about the closure requesting them to transfer the accumulated cenvat credit at its Delhi Unit to its Unit at Gurgaon.

Issue Raised

The issue raised was whether the appellant is entitled to claim the refund of unutilised cenvat credit on closure of unit?

Conclusion

The CESTAT allowed the appeal and held that since closure of a factory is not a routine phenomenon but happens in rarest occasion, the ‘relevant date’ in context with the limitation for filing of refund application under such circumstances cannot be reckoned by reading Explanation Clause provided in Section 11B.

Read More: Relief To SAIL: Writing Down Inputs For Income Tax Purposes Cannot Be Equated With Writing-Off Inputs Under Rule 3 (5B) of CCR: CESTAT

Case Details

Case Title: M/s. Kinol Lubes Pvt. Ltd. v/s Commissioner of Central GST Respondent and Central Excise

Case No.: Customs Appeal No.54844 of 2023

Date: 24.10.2024

Counsel For Appellant: Tarun Chawla

Counsel For Respondent: Manish Kumar Chawda

Click Here To Read Order

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

BSNL, MTNL VRS Compensation Governed By S. 10(10C), Not Retrenchment Exemption: CBDT

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has clarified that ex-gratia compensation received by...

Under E-Pay Tax → Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers Disclosure Scheme 2026 – User Manual

This document provides step-by-step guidance to taxpayers on generating Challan ITNS 289 through the...

Income Tax Appeals Can’t Be Kept Pending for Years Citing “Where Possible” Clause: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to decide...

Rs. 56.24 Lakh GST Demand Quashed Over Inadequate ITC Verification; Fresh Adjudication Ordered: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow, has set aside orders confirming...

More like this

BSNL, MTNL VRS Compensation Governed By S. 10(10C), Not Retrenchment Exemption: CBDT

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has clarified that ex-gratia compensation received by...

Under E-Pay Tax → Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers Disclosure Scheme 2026 – User Manual

This document provides step-by-step guidance to taxpayers on generating Challan ITNS 289 through the...

Income Tax Appeals Can’t Be Kept Pending for Years Citing “Where Possible” Clause: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to decide...