HomeIndirect TaxesUnion Budget 2025-26: FM Nirmala Sitharaman Proposes Basic Customs Duty Relief On...

Union Budget 2025-26: FM Nirmala Sitharaman Proposes Basic Customs Duty Relief On Import Of Life Saving Drugs/Medicines 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Today, the Union Budget was presented by the Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman which proposed basic customs duty (BCD), relief on import of life saving drugs/medicines.

With the objective to provide relief to patients, particularly those suffering from cancer, rare diseases and other severe chronic diseases, the Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman

proposed to add 36 lifesaving drugs and medicines to the list of medicines fully exempted from Basic Customs Duty (BCD). 

 Further, 6 lifesaving medicines was added to the list attracting concessional customs duty of 5%. Full exemption and concessional duty will also respectively apply on the bulk drugs for manufacture of the above. 

Specified drugs and medicines under Patient Assistance Programmes run by pharmaceutical companies are fully exempt from BCD, provided the medicines are supplied free of cost to patients. It was further proposed to add 37 more medicines along with 13 new patient assistance programmes.

Official Copy Of Budget Documents

Read More: Here’s Are Key Amendments In GST Act Proposed In Finance Bill, 2025

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

State Can’t Unilaterally Decide Breach and Bar Legal Remedies: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award

The Supreme Court has held that a State authority cannot unilaterally determine breach of...

Developments in Parallel Proceedings—Such as Insolvency Resolutions or OTS Approvals—Can’t Be Used to Reopen Concluded SLP: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that subsequent developments in parallel proceedings, including insolvency resolutions...

No Right to Appointment from Unfilled Vacancy Due to Non-Joining: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that a candidate cannot claim appointment to a government...

Relaxation in TET Doesn’t Bar Reserved Candidates from Open Category Selection Based on Merit: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that candidates belonging to reserved categories who avail relaxation...

More like this

State Can’t Unilaterally Decide Breach and Bar Legal Remedies: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award

The Supreme Court has held that a State authority cannot unilaterally determine breach of...

Developments in Parallel Proceedings—Such as Insolvency Resolutions or OTS Approvals—Can’t Be Used to Reopen Concluded SLP: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that subsequent developments in parallel proceedings, including insolvency resolutions...

No Right to Appointment from Unfilled Vacancy Due to Non-Joining: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that a candidate cannot claim appointment to a government...