HomeIndirect TaxesSAD Refund Can’t Be Denied for Invoice Format Differences When Substantive Conditions...

SAD Refund Can’t Be Denied for Invoice Format Differences When Substantive Conditions Are Met: CESTAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) cannot be denied merely on account of discrepancies in invoice formats, when core conditions under the law are fulfilled.  The bench of P. Dinesha (Judicial  Member) and Vasa Seshagiri Rao (Technical Member) has…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court Grants Notional Promotion to Railway Doctor

The Supreme Court has held that failure to communicate Annual Confidential Report (ACR) entries,...

Commercial Court Can’t Rewrite Arbitral Findings: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has ruled that courts cannot substantially modify arbitral awards under the...

Supreme Court Saves Navi Mumbai Mall From Demolition, Orders K. Raheja to Pay Rs. 318.31 Crore for Regularisation

The Supreme Court has set aside a Bombay High Court direction that would have...

Centre Must Apply Mind Before Refusing VRS: Supreme Court Quashes Rejection of IPS Officer’s Voluntary Retirement

The Supreme Court has held that while the Central Government has the final authority...

More like this

Supreme Court Grants Notional Promotion to Railway Doctor

The Supreme Court has held that failure to communicate Annual Confidential Report (ACR) entries,...

Commercial Court Can’t Rewrite Arbitral Findings: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has ruled that courts cannot substantially modify arbitral awards under the...

Supreme Court Saves Navi Mumbai Mall From Demolition, Orders K. Raheja to Pay Rs. 318.31 Crore for Regularisation

The Supreme Court has set aside a Bombay High Court direction that would have...