Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesSAD Refund Can’t Be Denied for Invoice Format Differences When Substantive Conditions...

SAD Refund Can’t Be Denied for Invoice Format Differences When Substantive Conditions Are Met: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
cestat

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) cannot be denied merely on account of discrepancies in invoice formats, when core conditions under the law are fulfilled.  The bench of P. Dinesha (Judicial  Member) and Vasa Seshagiri Rao (Technical Member) has…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Case Compilation

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 12, 2026.GSTCBI ARRESTS CGST SUPERINTENDENT FOR ALLEGEDLY...
Columns

SBI Develops UPI-Based Lending Model for Small Businesses Without GST Registration

State Bank of India (SBI) is developing a new digital lending framework that could...
GST

Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Proceedings Based Solely on Omitted Rule 96(10)

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice and the consequential...
GST

Rs. 1,800 Shortfall in GST Appeal Pre-Deposit Can’t Defeat Appellate Remedy: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has restored a GST appeal that was rejected because the...

More like this

Case Compilation

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 12, 2026.GSTCBI ARRESTS CGST SUPERINTENDENT FOR ALLEGEDLY...
Columns

SBI Develops UPI-Based Lending Model for Small Businesses Without GST Registration

State Bank of India (SBI) is developing a new digital lending framework that could...
GST

Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Proceedings Based Solely on Omitted Rule 96(10)

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice and the consequential...