Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesSAD Refund Can’t Be Denied for Invoice Format Differences When Substantive Conditions...

SAD Refund Can’t Be Denied for Invoice Format Differences When Substantive Conditions Are Met: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
cestat

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) cannot be denied merely on account of discrepancies in invoice formats, when core conditions under the law are fulfilled.  The bench of P. Dinesha (Judicial  Member) and Vasa Seshagiri Rao (Technical Member) has…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

Rs. 1.10 Crore GST Refund Must Be Paid in Cash After Business Closure: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has directed the tax authorities to pay a GST refund...
Indirect Taxes

Hospitals Can’t Retain Customs Duty Exemption Without Meeting Free Treatment Conditions: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has upheld the recovery...
GST

Later DRC-01, DRC-07 Dates Alone Can’t Make GST Proceedings Time-Barred: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that later dates appearing on Forms GST DRC-01...
Direct Tax

Rs. 1,021 Crore Tax Addition Against Harshad Mehta Deleted Over Errors In Securities Transactions: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted a ₹1,021.33 crore addition relating...

More like this

GST

Rs. 1.10 Crore GST Refund Must Be Paid in Cash After Business Closure: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has directed the tax authorities to pay a GST refund...
Indirect Taxes

Hospitals Can’t Retain Customs Duty Exemption Without Meeting Free Treatment Conditions: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has upheld the recovery...
GST

Later DRC-01, DRC-07 Dates Alone Can’t Make GST Proceedings Time-Barred: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that later dates appearing on Forms GST DRC-01...