S. 108 Statements Not Admissible but Raise Factual Issues; Delhi HC Directs Appearance Before Customs For Fresh Decision On Seized Gold

HomeIndirect TaxesS. 108 Statements Not Admissible but Raise Factual Issues; Delhi HC Directs...

S. 108 Statements Not Admissible but Raise Factual Issues; Delhi HC Directs Appearance Before Customs For Fresh Decision On Seized Gold

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

24/11/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

S. 108 Statements Not Admissible but Raise Factual Issues; Delhi HC Directs Appearance Before Customs For Fresh Decision On Seized Gold

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court while directing the appearance of the petitioner before customs department for fresh decision on seized gold held that the statements under Section 108 of the Customs Act are not admissible but raise factual issues. The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Shail Jain has directed the Customs Department to…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

S. 108 Statements Not Admissible but Raise Factual Issues; Delhi HC Directs Appearance Before Customs For Fresh Decision On Seized Gold

Membership Required

Latest articles

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 96 Crore Reassessment Citing ‘Change of Opinion’, Limitation Bar

More like this

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

About us

Company

Categories