Sourcing Of Services For Group Companies Can’t Be Considered As “Business Support Service” In Absence Of Consideration: CESTAT

Date:

The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that sourcing of services for group companies cannot be considered as “business support service” in absence of any consideration.

The bench of S.K. Mohanty (Judicial Member) and C J Mathew (Technical  Member) has observed that the mode of operation undertaken by the appellants in making payment for the services and getting the same reimbursed are not for provision of any service, but are only reimbursement for the services procured for their group companies. Thus, the reimbursement of the cost/expenses incurred by the appellants as per actual, cannot be regarded as consideration.

The appellant/assessee undertake works contracts. It has group entities. As part of the group policy, for maximising cost effectiveness, it incurs expenditure and gets reimbursement based on debit notes issued. This act was construed as provision of “business support service” by the department. Tax demand was confirmed along with interest and penalties. 

The tribunal noted that the amount claimed in the debit notes are for the simple reimbursement of the cost/expenses incurred by the appellants in terms of the cost sharing arrangements with the group entities, with the only purpose of cost effectiveness, having no service element involved therein. 

Therefore, the CESTAT held that in absence of any provision of service by the appellants to their group companies, mere claim of reimbursement of actual cost and expenses should not form a part of provision of any taxable service, for payment of service tax.

The tribunal allowed the appeal in favour of the appellants.

Read More: No Service Tax Payable On Supply Of Cranes To Municipality: CESTAT 

Case Details

Case Title: Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Navi Mumbai

Case No.: Service Tax Appeal No. 87430 of 2019

Date: 06.01.2023

Counsel For Appellant:  Adv. Bharat Raichandani a/w Adv. Mahesh Raichandani

Counsel For Respondent: Anand Kumar 

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at JurisHour. She has 5+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies like LiveLaw & Taxscan.

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

CBIC Operations Halted for Four Days Due to Network Failure, No Restoration Timeline Yet

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC)...

Mumbai Airport Gold Smuggling Bust: 14 Kenyans Among 18 Caught with ₹9 Crore Gold & Diamonds

In a massive crackdown, Mumbai Customs intercepted 18 passengers,...

Chennai Customs Additional Commissioner Sent To Prison Till Feb 25 in ₹2 Crore Green Peas Import Scam

A Chennai Court has sent the Additional Commissioner of...