Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesService Tax Can’t Be Levied On Notional Interest Calculated By Dept. On...

Service Tax Can’t Be Levied On Notional Interest Calculated By Dept. On Interest Free Security Deposit: CESTAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that service tax cannot be levied on the notional interest calculated by the department on the interest free security deposit.

The bench of Dr. Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) and Hemambika R. Priya (Technical Member) has observed that since the consideration for leasing of the property is rent, so what can be levied to service tax is only rent and notional interest on the security deposit cannot be subjected to levy of service tax.

The appellant/assessee is engaged in providing services of renting of private lockers covered under Banking and other financial services and are registered with the department. 

It was alleged that during the period from April 2012 to March 2015, the appellant demanded in the table above has charged locker ret as well as refundable interest free security deposits from their clients to whom the said lockers were rented out but has not paid due amount of service tax leviable on the value of taxable service which includes the notional interest on interest free deposits also.

The show cause notices were issued to the appellants proposing amount. The proposals were confirmed.

The tribunal while allowing the appeal quashed the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals).

Case Details 

Case Title: M/s Jyotsna Vaults v/s Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise And Central Goods And Service Tax, Jaipur

Citation: Service Tax Appeal No. 52501 of 2018

Counsel for the Appellant: Sanjiv Agarwal, Chartered Accountant 

Counsel for the Respondent:  Shashank Yadav, Authorized Representative 

Read More: 100% Cenvat Credit on Management Consultancy Services in Rambagh Palace Hotel Case Allowed: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Conversion To Islam Doesn’t Automatically Confer Backward Class Muslim Status: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the quashing of a Tamil Nadu government order enabling...

Unpaid Loan Amount Can’t Be Refunded to Buyer: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a homebuyer seeking a refund for delayed possession...

AT-1 Bond Write-Down Invalid: Administrator Can’t Exercise RBI’s Regulatory Powers: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has upheld the Bombay High Court’s decision setting aside the write-down...

Profitable Companies Can Face Insolvency Over Loan Default; Accounting Disputes Can’t Stall Admission: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a company’s profitability cannot shield it from insolvency...

More like this

Conversion To Islam Doesn’t Automatically Confer Backward Class Muslim Status: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the quashing of a Tamil Nadu government order enabling...

Unpaid Loan Amount Can’t Be Refunded to Buyer: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a homebuyer seeking a refund for delayed possession...

AT-1 Bond Write-Down Invalid: Administrator Can’t Exercise RBI’s Regulatory Powers: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has upheld the Bombay High Court’s decision setting aside the write-down...