HomeIndirect TaxesRule 26 Of Central Excise Rules, Can’t Apply Without Confiscation: CESTAT Cancels...

Rule 26 Of Central Excise Rules, Can’t Apply Without Confiscation: CESTAT Cancels Penalty in Rebate Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad, has set aside a personal penalty of Rs. 45 lakh imposed on an individual employee accused of involvement in an alleged fraudulent rebate scheme dating back to 2003–04 and held that the penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was legally unsustainable,…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CERSAI-Registered Secured Creditor Has Priority Over MVAT Dues: Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Attachment on Auctioned Property

The Bombay High Court has held that a security interest registered with Central Registry...

VCES Declaration Of BIS Can’t Be Rejected When Pre- and Post-2012 Service Tax Regimes Involve Different ‘Issues’: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench, has allowed the...

Missing Original Invoices Or Address Can’t Justify Denial of CENVAT Credit: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has allowed...

Customs Dept. Can’t Reject Declared Transaction Value Solely on DRI Alert Without Complying With R. 12: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

CERSAI-Registered Secured Creditor Has Priority Over MVAT Dues: Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Attachment on Auctioned Property

The Bombay High Court has held that a security interest registered with Central Registry...

VCES Declaration Of BIS Can’t Be Rejected When Pre- and Post-2012 Service Tax Regimes Involve Different ‘Issues’: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench, has allowed the...

Missing Original Invoices Or Address Can’t Justify Denial of CENVAT Credit: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has allowed...