Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesPenalty on Buyer Can’t Survive After Excise Demand Against Manufacturer Is Quashed:...

Penalty on Buyer Can’t Survive After Excise Demand Against Manufacturer Is Quashed: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Penalty on Buyer Can’t Survive After Excise Demand Against Manufacturer Is Quashed: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside the penalty holding that no penalty could survive against a buyer once the very foundation of the excise demand against the alleged manufacturer had already been quashed. The Bench of Justice Dilip Gupta (President) and Hemambika R. Priya (Technical  Member)…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

GST Dept. Can’t Use S. 73 To Recover Pre-GST CENVAT Credit On Eligibility Grounds: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that proceedings...
GST

GST Audit Detection Alone Doesn’t Prove Wilful Suppression: GSTAT Quashes S. 74 Proceedings

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that a...
GST

IGST Credit Mistakenly Claimed As CGST, SGST: GSTAT Quashes Demand Order, Directs Fresh Review

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has set aside an...
GST

SEZ Units Can Claim Refund Of Unutilised ISD Credit: GSTAT Dismisses 8 Dept. Appeals

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Rajkot, has held...

More like this

GST

GST Dept. Can’t Use S. 73 To Recover Pre-GST CENVAT Credit On Eligibility Grounds: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that proceedings...
GST

GST Audit Detection Alone Doesn’t Prove Wilful Suppression: GSTAT Quashes S. 74 Proceedings

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that a...
GST

IGST Credit Mistakenly Claimed As CGST, SGST: GSTAT Quashes Demand Order, Directs Fresh Review

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has set aside an...