HomeIndirect TaxesNo Service Tax Payable On Mandap Keeper Services: CESTAT

No Service Tax Payable On Mandap Keeper Services: CESTAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ahmedabad bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that no service tax payable on mandap keeper services.

The bench of Ramesh Nair  (Judicial Member) and Raju  (Technical  Member) has observed that the department has sought to classify the service in the nature of Mandap Keeper Service under the category of ‘support service’. From the definition of ‘support services’, it is clear that only the services which are in the nature of outsourced services i.e. the functions that entities carry out in ordinary course of operations themselves but may obtain as service by the outsourcing from others for any reason whatsoever. The services in the instant case do not qualify as ‘support services’ and therefore, the services provided by the appellant are covered under the negative list.

The appellant/assessee Ahemedabad Municipal Corporation has challenged the demandsraised under the head of Mandap Keeper Services for the period prior to 01.07.2012 and later too. 

For the period prior to 01.07.2012 the assessee pointed out that the services provided by them were not taxable as they were covered in negative list. The appellant is a government authority carrying out statutory function entrusted to it under the 12th Schedule of Article 243W of the Constitution.

The assessee argued that since the appellant is a local authority under the direct control of Government of Gujarat there cannot be a charge of deliberate suppression of information or intention to evade duty. 

The tribunal held that the negative list of services excludes from the levy of service tax all the services provided by the Government except those listed in the Serial No. (i) to (iv) of Clause (a) of Section 66D. The services provided by the appellant do not fall under the clause (i) to clause (iv) of Section 66D(a). 

The tribunal found that after 01.07.2012 the services provided by the appellant are covered by the negative list.

Read More: Pre-Deposit By Appellant Not Payment Of Duty; CESTAT Directs Refund Along With 6% Interest

Case Details

Case Title: Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Versus C.S.T. Service Tax – Ahmedabad

Case No.: Service Tax Appeal No. 10989 of 2019- DB

Date: 28.11.2024

Counsel For Appellant: Tushar R Shah

Counsel For Respondent: H. P. Shrimali

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

National Commission for Women (NCW): Powers, Functions, Legal Framework and Complaint Procedure

The protection of women's rights has been a central objective of India's constitutional and...

DGGI Clandestine Tobacco Manufacturing Case: Delhi Court Grants Bail, Reiterates ‘Bail Is the Rule, Jail the Exception’

In a significant order concerning alleged clandestine manufacturing and cess evasion under the HSNS...

Young Homemaker Jailed for 80 Days on Bald Allegations: Allahabad HC Slams Misuse of Gangsters Act

Concerning the application of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986,...

Khan Sir FIR Controversy: Patna Coaching Centre Firing Case Raises Questions on Arms Act, Attempt to Murder Charges

Popular educator and YouTuber Faisal Khan, widely known as "Khan Sir", has found himself...

More like this

National Commission for Women (NCW): Powers, Functions, Legal Framework and Complaint Procedure

The protection of women's rights has been a central objective of India's constitutional and...

DGGI Clandestine Tobacco Manufacturing Case: Delhi Court Grants Bail, Reiterates ‘Bail Is the Rule, Jail the Exception’

In a significant order concerning alleged clandestine manufacturing and cess evasion under the HSNS...

Young Homemaker Jailed for 80 Days on Bald Allegations: Allahabad HC Slams Misuse of Gangsters Act

Concerning the application of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986,...