HomeIndirect TaxesNo Service Tax Payable On Cartage Charges: CESTAT

No Service Tax Payable On Cartage Charges: CESTAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that no Service Tax is payable on cartage charges which is related to payments made to the supplier of the goods which included the transportation cost and is not included under Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services.

The bench of Dr. Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) and Hemambika R. Priya (Technical Member) has observed that the amount/expenses/charges were not paid by the respondent directly to the transporter for transportation of any goods. Thus, the activity cannot be covered under GTA Services, hence, no service tax liability can be levied on the aforesaid amount/expenses/charges under GTA services.

The Respondents, M/s Globe Civil Projects Pvt. Ltd. (GCPL) are registered for providing “Commercial or Industrial Construction Service”, “Construction of Complex Service” and “Works Contract Service”.

The anti-evasion branch of service tax Commissionerate, Delhi initiated the investigation against GCPL based on the Intelligence that the respondent GCPL had not paid due service tax on taxable service relating to ‘Construction of Commercial or Industrial building and civil structure’ and ‘Works Contract’. 

The service tax demand was raised on ‘freight and cartage expenses’ that amount shown as ‘Freight and Cartage Expenses’ in the balance sheet consists of expenditure towards cartage, transportation and pumping charges, transportation charges, insurance and car policy, side expenses and freight charges. 

The amount shown as a ‘cartage’ is related to payments made to the supplier of the goods which included the transportation cost. Transportation and pumping charges are in respect of pumping of ready-mix concrete (RMC) material for construction activity. The aforesaid expenses also include expenses towards insurance and car policy and site expenses (payment made to cab supplier).

The amount/expenses/charges were not paid by the respondent directly to the transporter for transportation of any goods. Thus, the activity cannot be covered under GTA Services, hence, no service tax liability can be levied on the aforesaid amount/expenses/charges under GTA services.

The tribunal dismissed an appeal filed by the department.

Case Details

Case Title: Commissioner of Service Tax – Delhi III Versus M/s. Globe Civil Projects Pvt. Ltd.

Case No.: Service Tax Appeal No. 54328 of 2015 [DB]

Date: 03.03.2025

Counsel For Appellant: S.K. Meena

Counsel For Respondent: B.L. Narasimhan 

Read More: AVVNL Not Liable To Pay Service Tax On Amount Recovered Towards Penalty: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 25 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 25, 2026.GSTS. 73(2) OF CGST ACT...

GSTAT Refers Challenge to Rule 96(10), Interest on IGST Refund Re-credit to Division Bench Over Substantial Questions of Law

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench, Bhopal, has held that...

Can Plastic Wrap Knit Fabric Qualify for Inverted Duty Refund? GSTAT Refers Classification Dispute to Division Bench

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bhopal State Bench, has referred an...

GSTAT Refers GST Refund Appeal Below Rs. 50 Lakh to Vice President for Further Directions

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench, Bhopal, has held that...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 25 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 25, 2026.GSTS. 73(2) OF CGST ACT...

GSTAT Refers Challenge to Rule 96(10), Interest on IGST Refund Re-credit to Division Bench Over Substantial Questions of Law

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench, Bhopal, has held that...

Can Plastic Wrap Knit Fabric Qualify for Inverted Duty Refund? GSTAT Refers Classification Dispute to Division Bench

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bhopal State Bench, has referred an...