Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesNo Service Tax Payable On Logistic/Handling Services Carried Out By Car Trader:...

No Service Tax Payable On Logistic/Handling Services Carried Out By Car Trader: CESTAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Author: Khushi J Prajapati

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, held that the logistic and handling services provided by car traders do not attract service tax.

Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled in favor of M/s Surjeet Auto Private Limited, stating that service tax did not apply to logistic and handling services provided by the car dealer.

The tribunal found that these services were integral to the sale of vehicles and fell within the ambit of sales price subject to VAT rather than service tax.

CESTAT looked at Section 65 (19) of the Finance Act, 1994 defining “Business Auxiliary Services” and concluded that the activities did not fall under this category.

The Tribunal rejected the demand for service tax and penalties associated with it, insisting that they should have been governed by VAT laws.

FACTS

M/s Surjeet Auto Private Limited, an authorized dealer of Hyundai cars, is engaged in the sale of vehicles and associated services. The company charged ‘logistic charges’ to customers, which comprised various vehicle preparation services such as loading, unloading, cleaning, and maintenance of cars before handing over the same to their respective buyers.

The Central Excise authorities contended that these charges were liable for service tax under the “Business Auxiliary Services” Section 65 (19) of the Finance Act, 1994. The authorities assessed a service tax liability of ₹4,89,964.

The appellant had already made a payment of ₹3,45,502 against it. The balance was demanded through a show cause notice along with a penalty amounting to ₹4,89,964 under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. Challenging this demand the appellant argued that these charges are part and parcel of the sale transaction and hence should attract VAT and not service tax.

Case Details

Tribunal: Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, Principal Bench

Service Tax Appeal Number: 50984 Of 2018

Date of Decision: 02.08.2024

Final Order Number: 56217/2024

Appellant: Surjeet Auto Private Limited

Respondent: Commissioner of Central Goods, Service, Central Excise

Judges –  Ms. Binu Tamta, Member (Judicial) and Ms. Hemambika R. Priya, Member (Technical)

Download Judgment / Order

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Latest articles

Supreme Court Upholds Income Tax Reassessment Of Former CJI Y.K. Sabharwal’s Sons Based On Fresh Material [READ ORDER]

The Supreme Court has upheld the reopening of income tax assessments for assessment years...

CGST Superintendents Announce Nationwide Protest Over Promotion Delays, Career Stagnation

Thousands of superintendents in the Central GST and Central Excise Department have announced a...

GST Collections Rise 22.9% To ₹2.31 Lakh Crore In October; Import Revenue Surges 42.2%

India’s gross Goods and Services Tax (GST) collections rose 22.9% year-on-year to ₹2,31,290 crore...

GSTAT Appeal Remedy: Supreme Court Declines To Interfere With HC’s Dismissal Of GST Writ Petition

The Supreme Court has dismissed a special leave petition challenging an Allahabad High Court...

More like this

Supreme Court Upholds Income Tax Reassessment Of Former CJI Y.K. Sabharwal’s Sons Based On Fresh Material [READ ORDER]

The Supreme Court has upheld the reopening of income tax assessments for assessment years...

CGST Superintendents Announce Nationwide Protest Over Promotion Delays, Career Stagnation

Thousands of superintendents in the Central GST and Central Excise Department have announced a...

GST Collections Rise 22.9% To ₹2.31 Lakh Crore In October; Import Revenue Surges 42.2%

India’s gross Goods and Services Tax (GST) collections rose 22.9% year-on-year to ₹2,31,290 crore...