Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesNo GTA Liability When Transmission Of Electricity Is Exempted From Service Tax:...

No GTA Liability When Transmission Of Electricity Is Exempted From Service Tax: CESTAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that no Goods Transport Agency (GTA) liability when transmission of electricity is exempted from service tax.

The bench of Ashok Jindal, (Judicial Member) and K. Anpazhakan (Technical Member) has observed that rural electrification involves services related to electricity transmission, which are exempt from service tax under GTA services. As per Notification No. 25/2012-ST, transmission and distribution of power are not taxable.

Notification No.45/2010-ST dated 20th July, 2010 has exempted all taxable services relating to transmission and distribution of electricity provided by a person to any other person that all such services are liable to service tax under the Finance Act, which were not being levied according to the practice during the impugned period. 

The appellant/assessee entered into an agreement with ASEB for installation and erection of 11KVA & LT line for rural electrification under Rajib Gandhi Gramin Vidyutikaran Yojna in Assam. As per the terms of the contract, the appellant is carrying electrification in lower Assam. 

The whole project is on turnkey project and to handover the project to the Assam State Electricity Board (ASEB) after completion of the project. The appellant has quoted the price on element of cost of the project showing the freight charges for transportation of materials to the project site, which is part of the project contract.

The respondent audited and during the course of scrutiny, it was observed by the Audit Team that during the period from April, 2008 to March, 2013, the appellant has received an amount of Rs.7,96,96,636/- as freight and insurance from ASEB in respect of transportation of goods brought in by them for carrying on turnkey project of rural electrification and did not pay the service tax.

Therefore, the proceedings were initiated against the appellant and demand of service tax was confirmed.

The appellant contended that it was engaged in the activities of installation and erection of electricity under Rajib Gandhi Gramin Vidyutikaran Yojna in the State of Assam. Any activity connected with the services, is exempted from payment of service tax under Notification No.45/2010- ST dated 20th July, 2010. Therefore, they are not liable to pay service tax.

The court while allowing the appeal held that the appellant has availed services under “Goods Transport Agency’s Services” in respect of the services provided by them for installation and erection of for rural electrification under Rajib Gandhi Gramin Vidyutikaran Yojna, which is exempted in terms of Notification No.45/2010-ST dated 20th July, 2010.

The court held that the whole of the demand of service tax is set aside. Consequently, the penalty imposed on the appellant is also set aside.

Case Details

Case Title: M/s Brahmaputra River Valley Trading (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Guwahati

Case No.: Service Tax Appeal No.75310 of 2016

Date: 24/01/2025

Counsel For Appellant: Debraj Sahu

Counsel For Respondent: S.K.Singh

Read More: Rs. 2,400 Crore GST Demand Confirmed Against HDFC Life Insurance | Latest GST Tax Controversy Update

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Plaint Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because Suit May Fail At Trial: Supreme Court Directs Record Of Pre-Registration Rejections

The Supreme Court has held that the likelihood of a civil suit being dismissed...

Prime Roadside Land Can’t Be Arbitrarily Allotted Away From Original Tenure Holders: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld an Allahabad High Court judgment directing restoration of a...

Supreme Court Orders Punjab, Haryana To Clear Hydel Power Arrears Over 20 Years; Upholds Capital-Cost Set-Off

The Supreme Court has directed Punjab and Haryana to supply approximately 11,973 million units...

OBC Creamy-Layer Ruling Applies To Pending CSE-2025 Service Allocations; Completed Selections Can’t Be Reopened: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has clarified that its March 11, 2026 judgment on determining Other...

More like this

Plaint Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because Suit May Fail At Trial: Supreme Court Directs Record Of Pre-Registration Rejections

The Supreme Court has held that the likelihood of a civil suit being dismissed...

Prime Roadside Land Can’t Be Arbitrarily Allotted Away From Original Tenure Holders: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld an Allahabad High Court judgment directing restoration of a...

Supreme Court Orders Punjab, Haryana To Clear Hydel Power Arrears Over 20 Years; Upholds Capital-Cost Set-Off

The Supreme Court has directed Punjab and Haryana to supply approximately 11,973 million units...