Valuation of Captive-Use Cement Not Liable to MRP-Based Duty: CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Ultratech Cement

HomeIndirect TaxesValuation of Captive-Use Cement Not Liable to MRP-Based Duty: CESTAT Quashes Excise...

Valuation of Captive-Use Cement Not Liable to MRP-Based Duty: CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Ultratech Cement

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

02/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Valuation of Captive-Use Cement Not Liable to MRP-Based Duty: CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Ultratech Cement

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has quashed the excise duty demand raised on Ultratech Cement Ltd. pertaining to clearances of cement in 50 kg bags for captive consumption between May 2016 and June 2017. The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta (President) and Hemambika R. Priya (Technical Member) that clearances…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Valuation of Captive-Use Cement Not Liable to MRP-Based Duty: CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Ultratech Cement

Membership Required

Latest articles

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 96 Crore Reassessment Citing ‘Change of Opinion’, Limitation Bar

More like this

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

About us

Company

Categories