HomeIndirect TaxesPrincipal Bench Of GSTAT To Examine Anti-Profiteering Cases: CBIC 

Principal Bench Of GSTAT To Examine Anti-Profiteering Cases: CBIC 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board Of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has notified that the principal bench of Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) empowered to examine anti-profiteering from 1 October 2024.

The Board empowered on the recommendations of the Goods and Services Tax Council,  empowered the Principal Bench of the Appellate Tribunal, constituted under section 109 (3) of the CGST Act, to examine whether input tax credits availed by any registered person or the reduction in the tax rate have actually resulted in a commensurate reduction in the price of the goods or services or both supplied by that registered person.

The Board has appointed 1st April, 2025 as the date from which the Authority under section 171(2) of the CGST Act shall not accept any request for examination as to whether input tax credits availed by any registered person or the reduction in the tax rate have actually resulted in a commensurate reduction in the price of the goods or services or both supplied by that registered person.

GSTAT to examine anti-profiteering

Relevant Provisions

Section 109 of the CGST Act pertains to the Constitution of Appellate Tribunal and Benches. Section 109(3) states that the Government shall, by notification, constitute a Principal Bench of the Appellate Tribunal at New Delhi which shall consist of the President, a Judicial Member, a Technical Member (Centre) and a Technical Member (State). 

Read More: CBIC Notifies Digitization Of Customs Bonded Warehouse Procedures

Section 171 of the CGST Act relates to anti-profiteering measures. Section 171(2) states that the Central Government may, on recommendations of the Council, by notification, constitute an Authority, or empower an existing Authority constituted under any law for the time being in force, to examine whether input tax credits availed by any registered person or the reduction in the tax rate have actually resulted in a commensurate reduction in the price of the goods or services or both supplied by him.

Sponsored

FAQs

Which Authority – NAA Or GSTAT To Examine Anti-profiteering?

The Central Board Of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has notified that the principal bench of Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) empowered to examine anti-profiteering from 1 October 2024.

Notification Details

Notification No. 18/2024 – Central Tax

Notification No. 19/2024 – Central Tax

Date: 30/09/2024

Read Notifications

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Pending NCLAT Appeals Bar Relocation Under Companies Rules: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that a company undergoing resolution under the Insolvency...

Punjab & Haryana HC Grants Bail in Rs. 66.60 Crore Fake ITC Case

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted regular bail to an accused booked...

Functional Similarity, Turnover Differences Crucial for Comparable Selection: Delhi HC Remands Transfer Pricing Issue in American Express Case

The Delhi High Court has delivered an important ruling in transfer pricing litigation involving...

CJI’s Comment Gives Birth To ‘Cockroach Janta Party’: How Did It Overtake BJP on Instagram?

A satirical online movement called the “Cockroach Janta Party” (CJP) has unexpectedly become one...

More like this

Pending NCLAT Appeals Bar Relocation Under Companies Rules: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that a company undergoing resolution under the Insolvency...

Punjab & Haryana HC Grants Bail in Rs. 66.60 Crore Fake ITC Case

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted regular bail to an accused booked...

Functional Similarity, Turnover Differences Crucial for Comparable Selection: Delhi HC Remands Transfer Pricing Issue in American Express Case

The Delhi High Court has delivered an important ruling in transfer pricing litigation involving...