Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesForeign Markings Alone Can’t Prove Smuggling: CESTAT Quashes Confiscation Of Gold &...

Foreign Markings Alone Can’t Prove Smuggling: CESTAT Quashes Confiscation Of Gold & Cash

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
CESTAT Gold smuggling

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside the confiscation of 10 gold biscuits and Indian currency amounting to Rs. 33.56 lakh, holding that mere foreign markings on gold cannot by themselves establish smuggling in the absence of corroborative evidence.  The bench of Angad Prasad (Judicial Member)…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Multiple Notices on Same PAN and 26AS Receipts Without Verification: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 2.31 Crore Service Tax Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...
Columns

Calls Grow for GST Portal to Introduce Dedicated Anti-Corruption Grievance Mechanism With Protection Against Victimisation

The introduction of a dedicated facility on the Income Tax e-Filing Portal for reporting...
Indirect Taxes

Entire Tooling Advance Can’t Be Added to Assessable Value; Only Proportionate Amortised Cost Is Includible: CESTAT Chennai

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

Inspection Forming Only Part of Wider Engineering Assignment Can’t Determine Service Classification: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, has held that an...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Multiple Notices on Same PAN and 26AS Receipts Without Verification: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 2.31 Crore Service Tax Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...
Columns

Calls Grow for GST Portal to Introduce Dedicated Anti-Corruption Grievance Mechanism With Protection Against Victimisation

The introduction of a dedicated facility on the Income Tax e-Filing Portal for reporting...
Indirect Taxes

Entire Tooling Advance Can’t Be Added to Assessable Value; Only Proportionate Amortised Cost Is Includible: CESTAT Chennai

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...