Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCESTAT Restores Exoneration of Jewellery Trader Luxury Watch Smuggling Case

CESTAT Restores Exoneration of Jewellery Trader Luxury Watch Smuggling Case

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has restored the exoneration of Gujarat-based jewellery trader in a high-profile luxury watch smuggling matter involving seized watches valued at Rs. 23.21 crore, holding that the Commissioner (Appeals) could not summarily overturn findings in his favour without identifying any legal or factual defect in…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court

National Highway Land Acquisition Award Passed Before January 1, 2015 Attracts Solatium and Interest Under 1894 Act: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that where compensation for land acquired under the National...
Supreme Court

Mere Physical Access to Plot No Ground to Deny Zero Period Benefit When Promised Front Road Was Unavailable: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a development authority cannot deny the benefit of...
Supreme Court

‘Excepted Matters’ Question Falls Within Arbitral Tribunal’s Jurisdiction U/S 16: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the question whether a contractual claim falls within...
Supreme Court

Personal Guarantor Bound By Arbitration Clause When Guarantee Forms Integral Part Of Loan Agreement: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that an arbitration clause contained in a loan agreement...

More like this

Supreme Court

National Highway Land Acquisition Award Passed Before January 1, 2015 Attracts Solatium and Interest Under 1894 Act: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that where compensation for land acquired under the National...
Supreme Court

Mere Physical Access to Plot No Ground to Deny Zero Period Benefit When Promised Front Road Was Unavailable: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a development authority cannot deny the benefit of...
Supreme Court

‘Excepted Matters’ Question Falls Within Arbitral Tribunal’s Jurisdiction U/S 16: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the question whether a contractual claim falls within...