The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore Bench, has set aside a demand of ₹1.52 crore holding that the valuation method adopted by the department was legally unsustainable and contrary to established principles under the Central Excise law. The bench of D.M. Misra (Judicial Member) and R. Bhagya Devi (Technical Member) has…
Rule 10A vs Rule 11 Valuation Dispute: CESTAT Sets Aside Rs. 1.52 Crore Excise Demand on Job Work Transactions
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.
Latest articles
Other Laws
Criminal Case Against Widow Can’t Automatically Block Son’s Compassionate Appointment: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court examined the scope of the Haryana Civil Services (Compassionate Financial Assistance...
Other Laws
Falling Tree Branch Not Motor Accident, Yet Victim Awarded ₹25 Lakh Compensation: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has ruled that injuries caused by a falling roadside tree branch...
Other Laws
Supreme Court Protects Child Victim from Repeated Psychological Evaluation; Sets Aside Bombay High Court’s Multi-Expert Panel Order
The Supreme Court has held that courts must prioritize the welfare, dignity, emotional security...
Other Laws
Fresh SCN Mandatory Before Punishment if Misconduct is Proved Through De Novo Proceedings After Defective Inquiry: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has held that where a departmental inquiry is found defective and...
More like this
Other Laws
Criminal Case Against Widow Can’t Automatically Block Son’s Compassionate Appointment: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court examined the scope of the Haryana Civil Services (Compassionate Financial Assistance...
Other Laws
Falling Tree Branch Not Motor Accident, Yet Victim Awarded ₹25 Lakh Compensation: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has ruled that injuries caused by a falling roadside tree branch...
Other Laws
Supreme Court Protects Child Victim from Repeated Psychological Evaluation; Sets Aside Bombay High Court’s Multi-Expert Panel Order
The Supreme Court has held that courts must prioritize the welfare, dignity, emotional security...

