HomeIndirect TaxesErroneous Interpretation Of Foreign Trade Policy : Delhi High Court Issues Notice...

Erroneous Interpretation Of Foreign Trade Policy : Delhi High Court Issues Notice To DGFT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Sanjeev Narula has issued a notice to the Union of India (UOI)/Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) concerning the computation of Net Foreign Exchange Earnings (NFE) and petition claiming erroneous interpretation of foreign trade policy.

The petitioner/assessee has challenged the orders passed by Directorate General of Foreign Trade, by which the Petitioner’s claim under the Service Exports from India Scheme for Financial Year 2017-18 and FY 2018-19, has been partially rejected. The Petitioner contended that the rejection is based on an erroneous interpretation of the provisions of the applicable Foreign Trade Policy.

The issue pertains to the deduction of the entire foreign exchange expenditure (including both export and domestic operations) from the foreign exchange earnings of notified services while determining eligibility under the Service Export from India Scheme (SEIS).

The assessee contended that the position adopted by the DGFT is not only contrary to the policy provisions but also inconsistent with their earlier stance in similar cases involving our client and other exporters.

Previously, the assessee preferred a second-level appeal before the Appellate Committee under Section 15 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act. However, the appellate authority has been non-functional due to the vacancy in the Chairman’s position. Consequently, the assessee filed this writ petition.

The court has issued the notice to the Union of India (UOI)/Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) and directed to file the Counter affidavit within a period of four weeks.

Read More: 5% GST On Coconut Oil Sold In Small Packages : Supreme Court

Case Details

Case Title: Intertek India Pvt. Ltd Versus DGFT & Ors.

Case No.:  W.P.(C) 17509/2024

Date: 19.12.2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Nikhil Gupta

Counsel For Respondent: Shiva Lakshmi

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026 Notified: MCA Revises DIR-3 KYC Filing Fee Structure

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has notified the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees)...

Arbitration Act is a Complete Code: Legal Heirs Must Challenge Arbitral Award Under S. 34, Not Article 227: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that legal representatives of a deceased party cannot bypass...

GST Arrest: Allahabad HC Allows Habeas Corpus Despite Its Earlier Bail Rejection & Pending SLP Before SC

In a striking development raising critical questions on the scope of constitutional remedies in...

Supreme Court Orders Back Wages from 1993, Slams Employer for Delayed Regularisation of Daily Wage Worker

The Supreme Court held that an employee illegally deprived of regularisation cannot be denied...

More like this

Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026 Notified: MCA Revises DIR-3 KYC Filing Fee Structure

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has notified the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees)...

Arbitration Act is a Complete Code: Legal Heirs Must Challenge Arbitral Award Under S. 34, Not Article 227: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that legal representatives of a deceased party cannot bypass...

GST Arrest: Allahabad HC Allows Habeas Corpus Despite Its Earlier Bail Rejection & Pending SLP Before SC

In a striking development raising critical questions on the scope of constitutional remedies in...