Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect Taxes10 High-End Drones Seized from Abandoned Baggage at Chennai Airport

10 High-End Drones Seized from Abandoned Baggage at Chennai Airport

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a significant seizure, customs officials at Chennai International Airport recovered ten high-end drones from an abandoned piece of baggage left behind by a passenger arriving from Sharjah. The incident took place in the early hours of Tuesday, raising concerns over potential smuggling attempts of surveillance-capable equipment.

According to sources within the Air Intelligence Unit (AIU), officers noticed an unclaimed black trolley bag near the baggage belt in the arrival hall. Upon inspection, they discovered ten drones neatly packed in retail boxes. The recovered items are suspected to be high-specification unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) intended for unauthorized commercial or surveillance purposes.

Preliminary investigations suggest that the passenger may have deliberately abandoned the bag to avoid customs scrutiny. Authorities are currently reviewing CCTV footage and airline records to identify the individual responsible for bringing the baggage into the country.

The value of the drones is estimated to be in several lakhs of rupees. Since drones are classified as restricted imports under Indian law, bringing them into the country without prior permission from the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) and a valid import license is prohibited.

Customs officials have seized the drones under relevant provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, and further investigation is underway to determine whether this is part of a larger smuggling network.

The incident underscores growing concerns about the use of unregulated drones, particularly in urban and high-security zones. Authorities have reiterated their commitment to tightening security protocols at international entry points and cracking down on attempts to bypass import regulations.

Read More: When Can GST Dept. File Appeal Even If Disputed Amount Is Below Threshold Limit?

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

ITO Cuts Rs. 1.42 Lakh Income Tax Demand to Rs. 671 Despite S. 154 Time-Limit Objection [READ ORDER]

In a significant taxpayer-relief case, the Income Tax Department has reduced a demand of...

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 20.16 Crore TP Adjustment as Mandatory SCN Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has set aside a transfer pricing order proposing an adjustment...

Homebuyers Can’t Be Penalised for Developer’s “Past Sins”: Supreme Court Rejects NOIDA’s Time Extension Charges as CIRP Costs

In a significant ruling protecting homebuyers affected by prolonged insolvency proceedings, the Supreme Court...

S. 106 Can’t Replace Proof of Guilt: Supreme Court Acquits Man in Kidnapping-Murder Case, Calls Investigation ‘Shoddy’

The Supreme Court has acquitted a man convicted in a kidnapping and murder case...

More like this

ITO Cuts Rs. 1.42 Lakh Income Tax Demand to Rs. 671 Despite S. 154 Time-Limit Objection [READ ORDER]

In a significant taxpayer-relief case, the Income Tax Department has reduced a demand of...

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 20.16 Crore TP Adjustment as Mandatory SCN Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has set aside a transfer pricing order proposing an adjustment...

Homebuyers Can’t Be Penalised for Developer’s “Past Sins”: Supreme Court Rejects NOIDA’s Time Extension Charges as CIRP Costs

In a significant ruling protecting homebuyers affected by prolonged insolvency proceedings, the Supreme Court...