Dish TV’s Classification Of Noise Block Down Converter Under Customs Tariff Heading 85437099 Upheld: CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld the classification of Noise Block Down Converter (NBC) used in manufacture of Set Top Box for television under Customs Tariff Heading 85437099 by Dish TV.

The bench of Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati (Judicial Member) and Anil G. Shakkarwar (Technical Member) has observed that explanation appended to the Notification No. 01/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) has clearly stipulated that those rules of interpretation and general explanatory note would follow, apart from the fact that HSN Note and WTO both also have suggested for classification of the disputed goods (LNB) in the same manner as being explained by the Board Circular No. 13/2013-Cus. We are, therefore, of the view that the Circular is squarely applicable to the Appellant. Dish TV who had appropriately classified the disputed item LNB under Tariff Heading No. 85437099 and therefore, the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in classifying it under Tariff Item No. 85291099 is held to be improper.

ThE appeal relates to classification of Low Noise Block Down Converter (LNB) which Appellant had classified under Customs Tariff Heading 85437099 on the basis of CBEC Circular No. 13/2013-Customs dated 05.04.2013 but the Assessing Officer of the Respondent-Department proposed the classification under Heading 85291099 as well as demanded differential Customs duty of ₹12,73,497/- with equal penalty and confirm the same through his adjudication order. 

Appellant assailed the order before the Supreme Court who passed in Civil Appeal No. 9956/2024 remanded the matter to the Tribunal to consider applicability of the Circular No. 13/2013-Customs to the Appellant’s case and to pass appropriate orders. 

Period of dispute was from 12.12.2017 to 14.03.2018 Concerning assessment of six Bills of entry, Appellant affirms that it had classified the imported goods LNB appropriately under Tariff Item No. 85437099 for use in manufacture of Set Top Box for television for Videocon D2H. 

The Commissioner has taken a different stand on this issue of classification of LNB on the basis of amendment effected to Customs Tariff by Notification No. 01/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and Notification No. 50/2017-Customs dated 30.06.2017 (as amendment by Notification No. 06/2018-Customs dated 02.02.2018) and justified that the same has becomes a statute as were made under Section 11A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, for which Circular No. 13/2013-Customs has become redundant and accordingly the Assessing Officer had proposed the classification under Tariff Heading No. 85291099 by discarding the classification made by the Appellant.

The tribunal held that  the Circular is squarely applicable to the Appellant who had appropriately classified the disputed item LNB under Tariff Heading No. 85437099 and therefore, the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in classifying it under Tariff Item No. 85291099 is held to be improper.

Case Details

Case Title: M/s. Dish TV India Ltd.  Versus Customs Commissioner

Case No.: Customs Appeal No. 85246 of 2021

Date:   16.06.2025

Counsel For  Appellant: A.R. Madhav Rao

Counsel For Respondent:  D.S. Maan, Dy. Commissioner

Read More: Chennai Customs Seizes Hydroponic Ganja Worth ₹1.2 Crore from Bangkok Passenger

Mariya Paliwala
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Freight Outward Is Includible In Sale Value For Assessing Excise Duty: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Bench has…

Conditions Imposed By Customs Dept. For Provisional Release Of Seized Goods Are ‘Discretionary’: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that the conditions imposed by the…

Department’s Failure to Transfer Appeal Internally Cannot Render It Time-Barred: CESTAT

The New Delhi Bench of Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal…

Production Of CA Certificate After 10 Years Nothing But Afterthought Exercise For Claiming Refund: CESTAT

The Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)…