Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxSC Upholds 100% Disallowance of Rs. 20.06 Cr Bogus Purchases Under Section...

SC Upholds 100% Disallowance of Rs. 20.06 Cr Bogus Purchases Under Section 69C

Direct Tax

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
SC Upholds 100% Disallowance of Rs. 20.06 Cr Bogus Purchases Under Section 69C

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has upheld the Bombay High Court’s ruling that confirmed 100% disallowance of bogus purchases amounting to ₹20.06 crore under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act.  A Bench of Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K.V. Viswanathan refused to interfere with the Bombay High Court’s detailed judgment dated March 3, 2025, holding that…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Company & PMLA

Jewellery Sale Proceeds Not Exempt From Bankruptcy Estate; ₹19.17 Lakh Must Be Returned: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has held that...
Direct Tax

Income Tax Demand Can Be Stayed Without 20% Deposit Where Reopening Faces Limitation Challenge: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has granted an unconditional stay on an income tax demand...
GST

Multiple GST Proceedings Over Same Suppliers: Calcutta HC Directs Dept. To Share Findings For Adjudication

The Calcutta High Court has directed coordination between investigating GST authorities and the Directorate...
GST

Audit Detection Alone Can’t Justify GST Fraud Penalty; Specific Suppression Must Be Proved: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thiruvananthapuram, has set aside a penalty...

More like this

Company & PMLA

Jewellery Sale Proceeds Not Exempt From Bankruptcy Estate; ₹19.17 Lakh Must Be Returned: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has held that...
Direct Tax

Income Tax Demand Can Be Stayed Without 20% Deposit Where Reopening Faces Limitation Challenge: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has granted an unconditional stay on an income tax demand...
GST

Multiple GST Proceedings Over Same Suppliers: Calcutta HC Directs Dept. To Share Findings For Adjudication

The Calcutta High Court has directed coordination between investigating GST authorities and the Directorate...