Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesDGFT Prohibits Sugar Exports Till September 30, 2026

DGFT Prohibits Sugar Exports Till September 30, 2026

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has prohibited the sugar exports with immediate effect till September 30, 2026, or until further orders, whichever is earlier.

The notification, issued by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry under the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 and the Foreign Trade Policy, 2023, amends the export policy of sugar under Chapter 17 of ITC (HS), Schedule-II.

Under the revised policy, the export status of sugar has been changed from “Restricted” to “Prohibited”. The prohibition applies to raw sugar, white sugar and refined sugar falling under ITC (HS) Codes 1701 14 90 and 1701 99 90.

The DGFT stated that export of sugar is prohibited with immediate effect till September 30, 2026. However, the restriction will not apply to sugar exports to the European Union and the United States under CXL and TRQ quota arrangements, subject to compliance with the prescribed procedures under relevant public notices.

The notification further clarifies that exports under the Advance Authorization Scheme (AAS) will continue to be governed by the existing provisions of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2023 and the Handbook of Procedures, 2023.

The government has also stated that the notification comes into force immediately and that the transitional arrangement provisions under Para 1.05 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2023 will not apply in this case.

Notification Details

Notification No. 16/2026-27

Date: 13/05/2026

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Writ Appeal Bench Can’t Reverse a Just and Reasonable Order Merely Because It Takes a Different View: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a High Court’s Division Bench hearing a Letters...

Public Property Auction Can Be Cancelled Before Conveyance If Price Is Substantially Low Despite Full Payment: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the Chandigarh Administration’s decision to cancel the auction of...

Temple Inam Land Can’t Be Gifted To Govt. Even For Public Purpose: Supreme Court Imposes ₹1 Lakh Costs

The Supreme Court has held that temple inam land cannot be gifted to the...

More like this

Writ Appeal Bench Can’t Reverse a Just and Reasonable Order Merely Because It Takes a Different View: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a High Court’s Division Bench hearing a Letters...

Public Property Auction Can Be Cancelled Before Conveyance If Price Is Substantially Low Despite Full Payment: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the Chandigarh Administration’s decision to cancel the auction of...